Sections

2013 in Review: The State of Narrative in Games

Pete Davison and Jeremy Parish look back at the ways this year's games succeeded and failed at telling great stories.

Article by USgamer Team, .

As video game technology has improved, we've seen examples of game makers getting more and more ambitious with the stories they want to tell. Triple-A video games now rival the biggest blockbuster movies in terms of budget and production values -- but are we getting better stories out of these improvements?

Pete Davison: The concept and use of narrative in games seems to be one of those things that no one can agree on. There are some who still enjoy the traditional "story as reward" approach favored by the most linear experiences out there, while others enjoy branching narratives with a variety of different conclusions, and others still are firmly in favor of completely abandoning pre-scripted stories in favor of the emergent narrative a player creates through their actions.

Personally, I'm someone who enjoys a good pre-scripted narrative, and I feel I've been well catered to over the years. Triple-A games tend to take a more linear approach to their stories -- though there are exceptions, of course -- and focus on providing spectacular set-pieces comparable to blockbuster movies. At the other end of the spectrum, though, the low-budget Japanese RPGs and visual novels that I've found myself enjoying in recent years have also provided entertaining stories with the bare minimum of technology -- and I've been really fascinated to see how indie developers have approached the concept of video games as a medium of delivering a story rather than attempting to be "fun."

Gone Home proves that games can excel as vehicles for good stories without making an effort to be fun.

There seems to be a widespread perception that there's not a lot of good writing in games and for sure there's a lot of titles out there whose stories don't stand up to in-depth analysis and criticism. But at the same time, there's also an awful lot of thought-provoking titles that aim to make use of the interactive medium to tell stories in a variety of interesting ways. What are some particular highlights (and/or lowlights) of the past year for you?

Jeremy Parish: Highlights? Honestly, I can't think of too many. The unhappy truth of 2013 is that I didn't have the opportunity to play many games with good narratives. I think we can chalk that up to the fact that I didn't play many indie games, mostly just products from larger publishers. And what 2013 taught me is that big-budget games have become disastrous for trying to tell a good story.

People toss around the term "ludonarrative dissonance" a lot these days; it's a fluffy way to say "the story and the game don't match up." I think the first time I really noticed this problem was in playing Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. I was placed in the shoes of CJ, a hardened but likeable street tough from GTA's version of Compton -- the first GTA protagonist with whom I could actually sympathize. But then I'd be forced to do things like chase down a gay man and kill him (because he was gay, and stereotypically so), shoot up a bunch of Army reservists doing their weekend's public service, or bomb GTA's version of the Hoover Dam. Those occasional exercises in excess really grated on me. GTA IV was even worse -- Nico Bellic whined to no end about how he wanted to get out of the killing business, but the game constantly forced me into shootouts. Then on occasion you'd have a mission where it was a big deal about whether or not to spare someone's life -- because apparently you can still consider yourself not a murderer as long as you don't kill anyone who’s actually named in the game's script. Morality as defined by SAG, I guess. With this year's GTA V, I quit paying attention to the story as soon as they let me. I wanted nothing whatsoever to do with the game's miserable trio of protagonist. GTA V is lovely to look at, but its narrative is just the worst.

Here we see Lara Croft raiding a tomb (n.b., “raiding" means “shooting" and a “tomb" is a “face").

Meanwhile, I could tell Tomb Raider wouldn't live up to its promise of presenting a bracingly realistic origin story for Lara Croft as soon as I played beyond the points where she makes her first kills. She trembles with remorse at killing a deer for survival, and she practically retches after protecting herself from a murderer with desperate, lethal force. But right away, she's plunking arrows into wildlife and gunning down squads of heavily armed thugs without blinking. The game goes to painstaking lengths to keep track of every cut and scrape that Lara picks up in the course of her adventure, provided she suffers them in a cutscene; the bullets and machete wounds and falling damage she incurs during the player-controlled sequences magically heal on their own. Even The Last of Us, intelligently as it handled its marriage of mechanics and plot, had moments where the disconnect between the two was jarring. How come enemies could hear the slightest noise you'd make, but totally ignored your partner character shouting to you?

The answer, of course, is because the needs of good gameplay demand these compromises. You need to hear the sounds and comments your partners in The Last of Us make in order to be able to work in tandem with them, and the game would suffer if enemies tore them apart whenever they made a peep. Tomb Raider's compromises aren't quite as easy to forgive, since I'm not convinced the decision to turn the series into a cover-based shooter was a particularly smart one; but for the kind of game Crystal Dynamics wanted to create, that sort of abstraction of injuries keeps things brisk and manageable. BioShock Infinite turned out to be a decent shooter set in a beautiful world that made its nature as a mere decent shooter all the more disappointing -- and at the same time, that shootery nature meant Irrational couldn't invest any real depth or interactivity into Columbia, as players are constantly advancing to the next area for the next shootout. For all its promise, Infinite turned out to be a pretty skin and interesting story stretched over a bog-standard FPS.

The beautiful graphics and top-notch voice acting made possible by big budgets come with a tragically Faustian price: They have to recoup those hefty investments, which means they have to play and unfold in a way that the most consumers imaginable will enjoy. AAA games have fallen into an inextricably deep rut as a result, with the best of game design intentions ultimately being corralled into a handful of sure-fire, focus-tested formulas. Be that as it may, what this means for developers with ambitions to become world-class storytellers is that they're trying to muscle a possibly interesting, theoretically compelling, potentially moving tale into a format designed for the primary purpose of making males 13-35 feel empowered by letting them breezily kill thousands of dudes/zombies/robots/whatever. There's a place for that kind of game action, just as there's a place for the tale of a young woman's coming of age or a man working through his past sins. But as we've seen this year, those places generally aren't one and the same.

That's why it's such a bummer I didn't get to play more indie games in 2013, as smaller-scale games come into being without a publisher breathing down their necks about budgets and marketability and can therefore adopt a play format that complements their creators' storytelling ambitions.

"Another fine parable you’ve gotten us into, Stanley!"

Pete: I concur. I must confess to having drifted away from a lot of triple-A titles in recent years for precisely the reasons you outline above: the dissonance between the stories the creators clearly wanted to tell, and the stuff that felt like it was put in there to make it "a better game," for want of a better term.

Indie stuff is absolutely where the exciting storytelling is happening. And it's not just about linear narratives, either; there's some genuinely cool experimental stuff going on in titles such as The Stanley Parable, for example, which initially appears to be a bit of a one-trick pony ("you can disobey the narrator!") but subsequently proves itself to have a lot of very clever ideas with regards to things like free will and, indeed, ludonarrative dissonance.

On a similar but simultaneously different note, Gone Home managed to tell several stories in parallel with one another through a combination of BioShock-style audio logs and much more subtle environmental cues -- the latter of which I found far more interesting and compelling to discover for myself. The bottle of scotch hidden on top of the father's bookcase; discarded letters in the trash can; the rooms that had seemingly been left abandoned. A lot of this stuff wasn't made explicit or signposted, but that made it all the more rewarding to discover.

I think part of the reason indie developers are doing much better at this sort of thing is because, as you say, their games are designed primarily as creative works rather than commercially viable products. An indie developer making a story-centric game isn't necessarily concerned with innovative game mechanics or, I don't know, being the next big thing for Let's Players or streamers to show their skills in; instead, they more often start from the perspective of wanting to say something, and making use of the interactive medium as a way of saying it in an interesting way.

Alarmingly, many of the year’s most high-profile game stories revolved around harsh treatment of women. And those were just the industry-focused news pieces!

I find it baffling that the big publishers are thoroughly stuck in the blockbuster mindset when there's a proven market for smaller, more thought-provoking entertainment; I wonder if we'll see a change in attitudes in the near future, or whether there'll continue to be this clear divide?

Jeremy: Well, retail niche games are basically victims of their publishers' success. Once you start producing games that sell millions, the little speciality games that sell five-digit figures become a lot more trouble than they're worth. Publishing a game through traditional channels comes with a lot of overhead, and the big publishers are tightening their budgets by focusing on a smaller collection of big-ticket titles and low-effort mobile games. Sony and Nintendo are kind of the exception since they own their own platforms and can afford to dick around with niche games. But for the most part, the publishing side of games has totally stratified into companies gunning for million-plus sellers exclusively, and little guys who wouldn’t know what to do if any of their games cracked six digits. Basically, niche games generally only come from companies whose entire business is built around more modest expectations, be it small third-party licensors like Xseed or totally independent developers.

Obviously, this means you're not going to see a lot of risk-taking in bigger games, the same way that Hollywood blockbusters are formulaic to a fault. You can blame the American way of life, if you like it -- we demand buffet-style value for everything. Impress us, but don't expect us to pay much for the privilege, and it's OK if everything turns out bland as a result.

It's a shame, because video games as a medium have so much storytelling potential. I've been replaying Super Metroid lately, and in many ways its approach to narrative -- which was completely wordless after the opening cut scene -- remains the gold standard, and I wouldn't be surprised to hear the creators of Gone Home were influenced by the way Super Metroid built story clues into every aspect of the experience, from background graphics to incidental sound effects. Or rather, a gold standard; games as a whole are wonderfully diverse, so there's no need to pigeonhole how they tell stories. Hollywood-style bombast is every bit as valid as a subtle indie game or a text-driven RPG.

Developers’ desire to tell stories with their games can make for some bizarre combinations, such as Senran Kagura, a hyper-exploitative button-masher that occasionally stops to become a visual novel exploring the rich inner lives of its semi-naked ninja schoolgirls. Wha?

But somewhere along the way, everyone involved needs to stop and ask themselves, "Is this kind of game really the best vehicle for telling the cool story I have in my head?" Often, the answer is "no," and when they try to slam together those incompatible concepts anyway the results don't do either aspect of their game any favors.

Pete: This is why I find visual novels so interesting. These are interactive stories that, in most cases, abandon all pretense of being "games" with rules and systems to learn, and instead make use of computer, console and handheld platforms as a simple means of telling a story through multimedia -- text, speech, graphics, animation.

You get rare exceptions where developers put some "game" in there too -- the Zero Escape series is a good example where the puzzles are fairly well-integrated into the narrative -- but for the most part, a good visual novel doesn't need rules and systems to be compelling, just a good story. And there are plenty of good ones out there if you look for them, from both Eastern and Western developers.

I've been pleased to see that the concept of the "story game" has branched out from the largely text-centric visual novel medium over time, though, and this year has been particularly good for this type of game in general.

As an example of the concept, I know David Cage's work isn't to everyone's taste, but his games are proof that an interactive experience where the narrative comes first, gameplay second can work really well; likewise for Telltale's recent output such as The Walking Dead and The Wolf Among Us. In both those cases, we're following a linear narrative, but often the simple fact that we have to physically do something in order to make the story proceed can add an interesting extra layer of immersion to the experience.

Telltale’s Walking Dead is a rare but welcome example of a game’s narrative vastly outstripping Hollywood’s approach to the same material.

There's a variety of approaches you can take with involving a player in a story, though, with some developers preferring to follow the old writer's axiom of "show, don't tell" rather than settling for largely non-interactive novel-style presentation with occasional branch points. The rise of games like Dear Esther and The Stanley Parable leave a lot of things open to interpretation; Thatgamecompany's titles Flower and Journey are even more abstract, with absolutely nothing made explicit to the player at all. All are valid approaches; not everything appeals to everyone, sure, but then what single piece of media does appeal to everyone universally?

Another great thing that has happened in the last year or so is the rise in prominence and awareness of affordable or even free tools eminently suited to making story-based games -- RPG Maker came to Steam; lots of people discovered the HTML-based Twine toolset; and visual novel creator Ren'Py continued to go from strength to strength, with developers like Christine Love showing what it's capable of in games like Hate Plus.

The great thing about all these tools is that they're opening up the world of making games to people who don't necessarily know how to code, but who know how to write. And one of the criticisms people often level at video games is that their stories have traditionally been written by people who, to put it politely, aren't writers first and foremost. While easy access to tools does, of course, mean a rise in amateurs trying their hand at making games and churning out disposable, low-quality titles, it also provides the potential for the next sleeper hit to emerge from a brilliant writer who wanted to make an interactive story, but didn't have the first clue about how to even pronounce "C#."

Jeremy: I hear you on visual novels, but I've yet to find cause to give myself wholeheartedly to that genre. The problem I have with visual novels is that they abandon nearly everything that typically defines a video game in order to tell a story -- which is fine, that's what the genre says on the label. But if you're going to be a book with some interactive bits grafted on, you need be as good a read as a book... and unfortunately, I've never played one that I feel quite reaches that goal. I can see why people enjoy them, but I don't think they're really for me.

Could any game use minimalistic narrative to such devastating effect as Super Metroid, or was that simply a lucky fluke?

Japanese visual novels have a double hurdle to clear, too. Not only does the source text need to be strong, the English translation and localization also need to be up to snuff. And both versions of the text need to jive; there's a tendency among localizers to throw in jokes or change the nature of characters and story points. That works in games with simpler text, but it's pretty destructive in a game that pivots entirely around its story.

I hate to even be critical about this, because I'm a writer by trade, and I'm not really comfortable calling out other writers over matters of taste. Fiction is hard! I write a lot, and I feel like I'm pretty decent at it, but man does my fiction writing stink. It seems I was born to be a mouthy pundit, not a master of prose.

Still, I think where we can both agree is that if you want a great story in a video game, you're not going to find it in something on the racks at Walmart. (Well, unless they have a copy of The Walking Dead in stock.) The resource demands and audience expectations weighing on big-budget retail games makes them antithetical to great storytelling, no matter how noble their creators' intents. Triple-A shooters just aren't the proper vehicle to convey anything particularly weighty without goofily undermining the message in the process. And that's fine; I don't go to see Marvel Comics movies to have my moral assumptions and ethical boundaries questioned, either. I just wish there were more room at the top for the games that can properly explore those themes.

Pete: I think that's something we can both agree on, for sure.

This article may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and buy the product we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.

Comments 10

  • Avatar for danger.to.others #1 danger.to.others 3 years ago
    I don't think Beyond gets enough credit. I thought that had a great story.
    Typical others everyone lists are my top ones. Bioshock, Walking Dead.

    Think this was also 2012, like Walking Dead, but Binary Domain had a great story with one huge flaw. It's voice actors in English were so bad, they diminished it.
    But the writing there and the plot point were better than I ever hear get mentioned.

    Far as servicing the game, I thought Splinter Cell: Blacklist had a great plot.
    It's not up there with The Last Of Us narrative, which I think was the best, but again, for framing the game and reason for doing what you're doing, it gave a great atmosphere, didn't drag and the characters were likable and the story did play out in a way that had a satisfying conclusion.

    Grand Theft Auto V was a mix.
    The humor was great. I laughed more often than any game that comes to mind, it had some really funny jokes in the story.
    But then it had a non-ending, simply left wide open for future DLC, the only one coming to any slight resolution was Michael.
    And man, I hated Michael's ending.

    *SPOILER*

    His family are the most spoiled, ungrateful users who the only reason I could imagine Michael didn't disown them all and up and leave was because he hated himself so much he felt like he deserved them and how they treat him (a conclusion I made up while playing it, nothing the story actually said).
    To give a message of let's just forgive all the stealing of his money, the cheating on him, the complete lack of love and constant manipulation of using him like an ATM....just forgive it all without remorse because WE'RE FAMILY.
    F**k that.

    I think that bothered me more than The Last Of Us ending, what with the writers presenting one person's personal feelings being more important than the greater good and the millions of future deaths.
    By his decisions, Joel became a greater damager to the Human Race than even Hitler.
    Way to go, Joel.

    *END SPOILERS*

    Testament to the story and acting as a whole that I cared, though.
    And Ellie....she's just like I imagine a daughter of mine would be. She's my favorite character of the year.

    Worst story of the year: Assassin's Creed 4. Gameplay and world are great, but the story is slight, goes nowhere and has no ending that matters other than that tacked on last second thing that had no impact.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for jeremycarrier12 #2 jeremycarrier12 3 years ago
    I just can't abide by any of these Beyond Two Souls or Walking Dead or Gone Home we people point to them as the future of narrative in gaming. Downvote all you like if it makes you feel better, silently disapproving, but thats just how I feel. They do away with so much interactions and game mechanics that are integral to what makes gaming so great and so different from any other medium, I think that's admitting defeat. Throwing your hands up, "to hell with interesting game mechanics" and settling on half-ass "choices" that don't really matter in The Walking Dead or clickable photographs and audio logs in Gone Home on the way the way to the world's most cloying ending. Just the briefest levels of interaction possible, the one thing that makes video games video games...that's what we're trying to praise? This is what's gonna get your favorite medium taken "seriously" by your peers? Barely playable SyFy level of narrative filmmaking like David Cage games?

    I'm not saying Bioshock and The Last of Us are perfect, they make plenty of concessions and awkward moments between the gameplay and the narrative bumping into each other in the hallway, but they're trying, damnit. Stuff like Dear Esther is an absolute dead-end for video game storytelling and I just can't go along with any of that.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for drewcohen07 #3 drewcohen07 3 years ago
    Jeremy and all the rest: I've immensely enjoyed these "2013 in Review" editorials. They have been terrifically-written and insightful to boot -- a reason to keep coming back to the site.

    To throw in my own two cents, I think that anyone interested in the state of narrative in video games really ought to try Papers, Please -- a game that has been lamentably under-represented in many Year in Review pieces. This was a game that I initially avoided; I had the impression that it would be over topical, self-serious -- and god, hasn't our ironic fixation on all things Soviet run its course? And now I'm in love with it.

    I've been largely turned off by many story-based games because the experiences and choices they provide players -- in addition to being badly written -- have been so hysterically high-pitched. Do you save the child, or the adult schmo, from horrible zombie death? (The child, by the way, is unconvincingly voiced by an adult actor.) The most affecting experiences I've had, vicariously, through books and films have been a good deal more subtle, even routine; whereas so many story-driven games feel like they are the mental byproduct of a freshman year ethics class.

    Even the more muted of these games appear to be more interested in Big Questions, Big Themes, tricks and inversions. They're never simply about people or situations.

    I am so glad I gave Papers, Please a chance. The experience of playing it was revelatory. The mechanics -- sorting through a desk cluttered with paper, cross-checking dates, places and facts -- are oddly engrossing. The whole thing is just so mundane, and -- as a result -- so ridiculously immersive, so heavy. When dramatic events occur, they feel dramatic! The game has humor, it has atmosphere galore. It has a consistent system by which the player interacts with it, and this system constitutes (is inseparable from) its story. And it achieves a sort of arc: when you're finished with it, you feel like you've gone from one place to another.

    Play this game! It does so much right, and deserves to be played by as many people as possible.Edited 2 times. Last edited December 2013 by drewcohen07
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for SatelliteOfLove #4 SatelliteOfLove 3 years ago
    "Could any game use minimalistic narrative to such devastating effect as Super Metroid, or was that simply a lucky fluke?"

    Like with the rest of the game, game narratives won't get actually better until a large percentage of people stop conflating "quantity of story" with "quality of story".
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for brionfoulke91 #5 brionfoulke91 3 years ago
    I love games with subtle narratives like Super Metroid and Dark Souls. Those are both excellent examples of a way to intertwine story and gameplay without shoving the story in your face.

    But on the other hand, some of the absolute BEST stories I've experienced in games have come from visual novels. Specifically the Phoenix Wright games, Dangan Ronpa, and the Zero Escape series (999 and Virtue's Last Reward.) Especially Virtue's Last Reward... that might have the best written narrative of any game I've ever played.

    I think it's easier to have a compelling narrative in a visual novel format... when there's no gameplay to get in the way of story, you can do so much more with a story. You can have character development, twists, drama. Without linear storytelling, it's hard to have those things, at least not without compromising them.

    I also agree with the sentiment that AAA games are the worst place to go for good stories. With the notable exception of Dark Souls, if that counts as an AAA games. Emulating blockbuster movies isn't gonna work out so well when a lot of the current blockbuster movies are terrible.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for DiscordInc #6 DiscordInc 3 years ago
    @jeremycarrier12 Except no one wants to see all games like that. As much as a lot of gamers, myself included, want to see games do experimental things with narrative we still want games where you just run around and jump on stuff. The wonderful thing about gaming right now is that there is room both for narrative experiences like Gone Home and games like Super Mario 3D World where Bowser kidnaps fairies because reasons. We don't have to say that one is necessarily a better or more engaging experience than the other, or say that they represent the end goal of game design.

    Saying that you're sick of narrative games is like saying you're sick of any other gaming genre. If you don't enjoy them, then there is plenty of other stuff out there for you.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Tricky_Rich #7 Tricky_Rich 3 years ago
    @danger.to.others re: The Last of Us

    SPOILER

    I don't think it was the writer's intent to present Joel's feelings towards Ellie as justifying his massacre of fireflies at the end of the game. Rather, I think the intent was to highlight how damaged Joel was and how much he needed Ellie, so would be willing to do such monstrous things.

    There is never any attempt to justify his actions, he just does what he does and then lies to Ellie about it and we the gamers are complicit in his actions because we played the game to get to the end of the story.

    Joel was never portrayed as a good guy during the course of the game and his brother even gives him grief over some of the terrible things they did together in the name of survival. It's only at the end of the game, do we get to experience this for ourselves, as he puts his own selfish feelings above the greater good and I for one felt that it was an authentic (if unjustified) character action for this deeply damaged individual to take, even if it was totally immoral.

    END OF SPOILEREdited December 2013 by Tricky_Rich
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for docexe #8 docexe 3 years ago
    I agree with some of the sentiment presented here in that, right now, Indie and smaller games are doing a better job with their narratives than AAA games and without incurring in so much ludonarrative dissonance. I don’t know about Gone Home or The Stanley Parable, but two small games that I finally played to completition this year (Limbo and Hotline Miami) do a terrific job with simple mechanics and subtle minimalist narratives, without sacrificing player agency in the process.

    That being said, while I understand that commercial interests might play a part in the problems of ludonarrative dissonance in so many AAA games, I don’t think it’s impossible to present a game in that space with a great story that doesn’t conflict so much with the gameplay. It will take time and require a very specific set of creators and conditions, but I don’t think it’s completely impossible. It’s very rare admittedly, but even in Hollywood there is the occasional Blockbuster movie with a good and thought-provoking story (the Dark Knight Trilogy and Inception from Christopher Nolan immediately spring to mind).

    @drewcohen07 I have read a lot about Papers, Please on Gamasutra, although I haven’t played it yet (mostly because I always get distracted by something else). I think the major problem for it to reach a bigger audience is that its premise can sound very off-putting to most people. But from what I have read, it seems that it indeed presents an interesting and compelling narrative that is perfectly married to its mechanics and doesn’t sacrifice interactivity.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Windwhale #9 Windwhale 3 years ago
    Honestly I feel a little embarassed and dissapointed whenever I read an article that calls the stories in Bioshock or The Last Of Us good or even great. Both titles pretend to be meaningfull and use 'clever' twists and metalayers to hide the fact that they have absolutely nothing to say, at least nothing that goes further than what the kill-them-all game mechanics convey. Compared to other media (literature, theatre, movies) video game storytelling is still in a very rough state. The standards are so low, that people seem to be exited about everything that goes a little beyond 'save-the-princess/world', without realizing how hollow the actual stories often are. Super Metroid for example (which I really appreciate as a game) has a very simple, cliched story. And while it does a lot of things right in terms of atmosphere and presentation, it also stumbles in the area of narrative: Why is it impossible for Samus to pick up the baby-Metroid in the beginning (is it because of her arm-cannon?) Why do destroyed enemies leave health items and missiles? (At least they tried with Fusions X-parasites). I do not blame the developers of SM, since it aspires not to be more than it actually is. But I think it should not be held up as a prime example for great storytelling - it is merely passable in that regard. Only few developers go beyond scratching at the surface of the huge potential games hold in terms of storytelling. Gone Home and Flower are steps into the right direction, as are some adventure games. But we still have a long way to go to see storytelling in games that can proudly stand alongside the best stories in other media.Edited 2 times. Last edited December 2013 by Windwhale
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Mithono #10 Mithono 2 years ago
    I'm late to the debate now, but this remains a very interesting article. I noticed a trend in the arguments presented that cross between a) good ways of telling games, and b) good game-stories. You guys go into great depth on the former and express some excellent points that come across as critical yet inoffensive (most writers don't do that). I find it hard to disagree with your points and you guys seem to be clearly quite clued up on what you believe is a good way to construct narratives. I still think there's a question of what makes a story good though. Misplaced blockbuster hype aside, games may be getting better at telling stories, but they don't usually have stories that are worth hearing. I fear we are getting into a position where we will end up regarding it as more important to tell a story in a particular way (call it 'the experience!') than to play a game with a good story.

    It may even be such the case that I'm more willing to divide Games-With-Good-Experiences and Games-With-Good-Stories into two separate categories. Indie Games can now often combine the two, but the result is more like a slice of interest rather than a whole-pie. Even a game like Journey - which is a much more evolved game than a well-regarded indie-title like Hotline Miami or Limbo - still leads with a minimal approach. The story is the journey. A trope of modern-day video-game design. It is it in concentrated form.

    I also wonder where games like Killer 7 and No More Heroes would fit into this debate. These are games that are violent and appeal to the usual thirst-for-bloodlust in ways that silly Blockbuster games do, but they do so in a way that actively disorientates the player and even detaches them from the experience because of their mechanics. I often think one of the worst things about modern-day games is how fluid they are, and how the experience becomes even more passive as a result. Indie Games, again, show the counter-argument to this very thing.Edited June 2014 by Mithono
    Sign in to Reply

Comments

Close