Sections

It's Hard to Be Excited About EA's Respawn Deal After Visceral and BioWare Montreal

Ah, that bittersweet feeling.

Opinion by Mike Williams, .

Electronic Arts is buying Titanfall developer Respawn Entertainment, with a potential price tag of $455 million in total. Titanfall 2 was one of last year's best first-person shooters in my opinion, with an absolutely amazing campaign from beginning to end. Unfortunately, Titanfall 2 got swallowed up in the holiday rush and ended up performing below expectations. So, I should be happy that Respawn Entertainment is getting a chance to develop more titles with all the resources EA can provide. I should be happy we're getting more Titanfall and Respawn's Star Wars.

And yet, there's a rumbling in my stomach. A feeling of anxiety and unease.

That's because Respawn's acquisition comes not even a month after EA shut down Visceral Games. The studio offered its blood and sweat on titles like the Dead Space franchise and Battlefield Hardline. Visceral was working on its own original Star Wars title, code-named Ragtag, before EA summarily decided to close the studio and move the production assets to another EA studio.

Perhaps my anxiety is because more than any other major publisher, EA has a history of acquiring great studios, mishandling them, and ultimately shutting them down. Bullfrog Productions in 2001, Westwood Studios in 2003, Maxis in 2004, Origin Systems in 2004, Pandemic Studios in 2009, Phenomic Game Development, DreamWorks Interactive, Playfish and Black Box Games in 2013, Mythic Entertainment in 2014. Those are the studios behind classics like Populous, Dungeon Keeper, Command & Conquer, SimCity, The Sims, Ultima, Mercenaries, Star Wars: Battlefront, Medal of Honor, Need for Speed, and Dark Age of Camelot. And none of that counts internal or satellite studios that have been killed, like Danger Close, Bioware Montreal, DICE Canada, and Easy Studios.

Activision is the other major publisher that has slashed and burned a ton of studios in its time (Neversoft, Luxoflux, and Bizarre Creations say 'Hi'), but Activision Blizzard at least feels like it's stable these days. Raven Software, Beenox, and High Moon Studios don't get a lot to do on their own these days, but they're still vaguely around. There's a solid, unstandable fear that EA ruins studios slowly.

The question is "Why?"

The Freedom To Dream, The Weight of Reality

Reporting on the inner workings and deaths of Bioware Montreal and Visceral Games by Kotaku's Jason Schreier points to a publisher that doesn't quote know what it wants to be. EA is a publisher that wants to allow for some degree of creative freedom. Mass Effect: Andromeda's original idea was described as "No Man's Sky with BioWare graphics and story." Ragtag, Visceral's Star Wars project with former Uncharted lead Amy Hennig, was equally ambitious.

"Picture the Death Star, and they all have jobs," one anonymous developer told Kotaku. "One Stormtrooper was on a command unit, moving boxes around. Some guys would be droids. It was supposed to be set up so it was all real, and it felt like they had jobs to do. We wanted to tap into emotions, so you could mess with Stormtroopers' emotions. Go into a room, turn the lights off. He goes back in and turns them back on. Then you turn them off again. At a certain point he starts getting spooked, acting irrationally, and bringing friends in."

Bioware Montreal was built from the ground up to handle the new Mass Effect, but the project apparently floundered from 2013 until 2015, when creative director Mac Walters came onboard to whip everything into shape. Likewise, Visceral Games changed its entire operating hierarchy, minimizing management and offering a system that gave creative leads more leeway, but Hennig and the rest of her team reportedly clashed.

Despite offering this freedom, both reports also state that the teams lacked resources from EA: their dreams were bigger than the resources available. Sources at BioWare said the team felt understaffed; the animations were where Andromeda took its lumps, but that specific team just didn't have the manpower during development. Visceral lost people to further development on Battlefield Hardline DLC and even then the studio wasn't well-employed for a huge triple-A project. The studio had less than 100 employees and it was located in San Francisco, meaning salaries and costs were way too high.

Frostbitten

EA wants to give its studios space to breathe, but it also wants to be like other publishers. EA would prefer to use a few proprietary internal engines for development, like Ubisoft does across a number of titles. When EA acquired DICE in 2005, it finally had a team focused purely on high-end engine development. DICE maintained Frostbite and EA wanted every one of its subsidiaries to be using the engine. The problem is Frostbite was originally built for one type of game—the first-person shooter—and getting the engine to work with other genres was a costly process.

When BioWare started using Frostbite in 2011 for Dragon Age: Inquisition, they had to design all the tools needed to make a massive RPG. Many of those tools would transition over to Mass Effect: Andromeda, but BioWare Montreal still had to build most of what it needed from scratch.

"Frostbite is a sports car. Not even a sports car, a Formula 1. When it does something well, it does it extremely well. When it doesn't do something, it really doesn't do something," said one developer in the report. "Whenever you're trying to do something that fits the engine-vehicles, for example-Frostbite handles that extremely well. But when you're building something that the engine is not made for, this is where it becomes difficult."

Andromeda needed bigger maps than Frostbite could handle and better animation for its extensive dialog scenes. Likewise, Visceral's team on Ragtag had to build out tools that Naughty Dog had been using since the first Uncharted. It was a tall order, especially when you're supposed to be competing with other titles built on existing, evolving technology.

Code-name Ragtag's sole demo.

Recurrent Player Spending

EA also wants to be a moneymaker. Over at rival publisher Take-Two, Grand Theft Auto Online and NBA 2K rake in loads of money every year on microtransactions and online multiplayer. Even EA itself sees a significant amount of revenue from FIFA and Madden Ultimate Teams. It's hard to be in an executive position, see that kind of money, and not try to make a few changes.

Mass Effect: Andromeda didn't land like EA and BioWare hoped. It came in rough and BioWare Montreal never recovered from the poor launch. But while there are "no planned future patches" for the single-player, BioWare will continue to add multiplayer content to the game.

You can still get Andromeda Points!

"In the coming weeks, our multiplayer team will provide details of their ongoing support and upcoming content, including new multiplayer missions, character kits, and what's in store for N7 Day. We appreciate all the millions of people who came with us to the Andromeda galaxy. We hope to see you again in the Mass Effect universe," said the company at the time.

In Visceral's case, the additional studio working on Ragtag, EA Motive, was eventually moved to work on the single-player campaign for Star Wars: Battlefront II. This move made sense, as Battlefront was a proven property with 13 million units shipped. Battlefront II even added loot boxes as a new form of progression, offering enhanced monetization.

EA insisted that it wasn't a war between single-player content versus a live service that killed Ragtag. One former developer at Visceral Games even called Ragtag's cancellation a "mercy killing." But you can read between the lines of EA CEO Andrew Wilson's statements on the studio's closure.

"During the development process of the game that they were working on, we've been testing the game content with players, listening to their feedback in terms of what and how they wanted to play and really tracking that closely with fundamental shifts in the marketplace and we are seeing an evolution in the marketplace. And it became clear to us that to deliver the experience that players wanted to come back and enjoy for a long time, that we needed to pivot the design," said Wilson.

"It has become clear that to deliver an experience that players will want to come back to and enjoy for a long time to come, we needed to pivot the design," added EA's Patrick Söderlund.

It's not hard to see those "fundamental shifts" as a move towards games as a service, with monetization, loot boxes, and endless DLC. Especially if you want to keep players coming back for a long time.

Is Respawn the one getting stabbed and we just don't know it yet?

All of this is what feeds into this anxiety over Respawn Entertainment's prospects. You don't have look back at EA's long history to find cautionary tales. You can look over the past year and find two studios that the publisher has outright killed. We already know that Respawn Entertainment is developing a third-person action-adventure game in the Star Wars universe. With today's news we also know the studio will be working on something Titanfall-related.

The question is, how many of the problems above will repeat themselves at Respawn Entertainment? Will they have enough staff? Will they be forced to work with Frostbite? How much will be added in the name of additional monetization? And ultimately, will I be writing an article about the "death of Respawn" 5-to-10 years down the line, lamenting the slow decline of the studio after the great Titanfall 2?

I don't know. And that's why myself and others are afraid.

This article may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and buy the product we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.

Comments 14

  • Avatar for ojinnvoltz #1 ojinnvoltz 12 days ago
    I am okay with Respawn dying as long as I get Titanfall 3 beforehand. Ideally it'll have the same microtransactions of buying the cosmetics I want, but I'm sure EA will shove loot boxes into it.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for docexe #2 docexe 12 days ago
    Sigh… I still maintain that EA winning that online poll for “Worst Company in America” was ridiculous. But frankly, it’s not surprising why so many people hate them, considering their long history of buying studios with beloved franchises only to badly mismanage them then close them.

    To put it bluntly and simply: They are the best example of everything that’s wrong and terrible about the corporate site of game publishing.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for shurn #3 shurn 12 days ago
    Will be absorbed into dice in a year.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for BulkSlash #4 BulkSlash 11 days ago
    I reckon we’ll be saying goodbye to Ghost Games soon, this year’s Need for Speed has reviewed fairly poorly so it won’t be long before EA shut them down.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for NotCarolKaye #5 NotCarolKaye 11 days ago
    I've yet to see a single positive reaction to this news. The gaming public seems united on this one. It's pretty remarkable.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Kgbossman #6 Kgbossman 11 days ago
    Do you no how to get cheatcod for ps4 GTA
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Thetick #7 Thetick 11 days ago
    Respawn has zampella and west and they created a great dev company after being fired. They can handle ea and if not, they just make another dev studio. I think it will be fine.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for admiralsnackbar #8 admiralsnackbar 11 days ago
    Titanfall 2's release date makes perfect sense now.

    EA published it and pushed it out to die between the two largest FPS launches of the year. Then, when the game "underperformed", they could drive down the asking price for Respawn in negotiations.

    Nexon offering to buy Respawn probably accelerated EA's timeline but this is absolutely out of their playbook. I trust Zampella to be transparent about it, at least moreso than others, but I'd be putting together a portfolio if I was a dev there. Just be prepared, folks.

    The axe is coming.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Retro-Plissken #9 Retro-Plissken 11 days ago
    This feels to me like ea killing a competitor. Brutal.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for KaiserWarrior #10 KaiserWarrior 11 days ago
    EA's got a reputation for a reason. Everyone knows how this story is going to end.

    And yet people keep giving EA money by buying their games and their microtransactions. It's like we want to see good studios die.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for LBD_Nytetrayn #11 LBD_Nytetrayn 11 days ago
    If Respawn wants out of the gaming business, there are more graceful ways to do it.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for SatelliteOfLove #12 SatelliteOfLove 10 days ago
    @docexe

    And that mismanagement is the crux of this. It's not even a majority of the problems being just the market doing wierd stuff, it's complete ineptitude to make good top-down decisions about what is known.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for rommy667 #13 rommy667 9 days ago
    Hopefully the same faith EA dished out to so many great devs/ips will come back and do the same to them...............
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for docexe #14 docexe 8 days ago
    @SatelliteOfLove Mmmm… That’s a fair point. I suppose it’s kind of telling how, despite committing many of the same sins as EA, Activision and Ubisoft don’t get the same amount of vitriol. Then again, their track record in the past few years have been relatively (relatively!) better than EA’s.
    Sign in to Reply

Comments

Close