Sections

The Legend of Zelda Makes a Surprisingly Good First-Person Shooter

I took an unconventional approach in a demo session with the upcoming Wind Waker remake... and it worked much better than you might expect.

Preview by Jeremy Parish, .

In my heart, I know there's something deeply heretical about taking the Zelda game that features, hands-down, the series' most elegant swordplay and treating it like a first-person shooter. But you know... if it works, it works.

The Wind Waker has always been one of my favorite Zelda games. I love its brilliant visual style, which -- with a bit of updated texturing and some new lighting effects -- holds up marvelously 10 years after its debut. I love its vast, open-world design. But most of all, I love its combat.

Fighting in the Wind Waker is a balletic, responsive affair. If enemy encounters were structured as in normal Zelda games, with one or two foes facing off against Link at a time, it might even be considered laughably easy. But the great thing is, it doesn't play like other Zeldas; its creators took advantage of Link's reactive swordplay style (which centers around evasion and counters) to beef up the number of opponents you face at any given time. And it's a testament to how well it works that I was able to jump into the Temple of Time (an area late in the game populated by tons of high-level monsters) and dance my way through on Hero mode despite not having touched Wind Waker in a decade.

Spoilers: Still one of the most fascinating and surreal video game locations ever, even after all this time.

Hero mode, as in Skyward Sword, is a more hardcore rendition of Wind Waker where enemies hit twice and hard and the only way to recharge Link's health is to use a potion or collect a Heart Container. Against these odds, I nearly made it through the temple's throng of enemies on 10-year-old muscle memory alone (a Moblin's lucky strike toward the end of the encounters ultimately felled me). It's just as fun and exciting to play today as it was back in 2003.

And yet, after testing my luck playing the "right" way, I decided to take a different approach to Wind Waker. I switch over to Link's bow and arrow and took careful aim in the first-person view by tilting the Wii U Game Pad just so and started taking out enemies from across the room. And then I noticed that Link now has a newly acquired ability to move while in first-person mode rather than being limited to panning around. So I stayed in first-person mode, plinking bad guys from a distance and shooting them again when they recovered. I completely cleared out the walkways above the temple's floor this way, switching to melee controls only when an armored Darknut began bearing down on me. But once his armor was off, a brace of arrows took him down.

What really struck me is not that Wind Waker works as an FPS but rather that it works damn well. Speaking as someone who's spent 150 hours or so firing enchanted bolts into bandit hordes in Skyrim, I found Link's enhanced archery skills to be every bit as second-nature as his dynamic swordplay. I take back some of my recent criticisms of Wii U's Game Pad; while it still has its issues, it works beautifully for first-person gun- (and arrow-) play.

Link tries out a little Cloud Strife cosplay.

It helps that Wind Waker's implementation of Game Pad panning uses relative centering. That is, unlike Pikmin 3, whose camera mode is more absolute and requires you to move the Game Pad through a full axis of motion in order to orient on objects in relation to what's shown on-screen, in Wind Waker HD the direction you're holding the pad when you enter first-person mode becomes straight ahead. This allows for very subtle tracking movements. Moving Link with the left stick while adjusting his viewpoint with a combination of the right stick and Game Pad makes standard dual-stick controls feel clumsy and antiquated.

Wind Waker's new first-person friendliness is only one of several ways the game feels friendlier to contemporary gaming audiences. Nintendo has made a number of tweaks to the game's mechanics, including adding quick on-screen prompts for parrying enemy attacks, high-speed ocean travel, and a streamlined Triforce quest. Honestly, while most people will almost certainly welcome these changes, they're not entirely necessary. The most incredible thing about Wind Waker HD is how contemporary the underlying game already feels.

Strip a Darknut of his armor and knock his weapon away, and he'll still come at you with kung-fu. That's persistence.

I don't know which conclusion I should draw from that fact. Was Wind Waker really so far ahead of its own time that only a decade later does it finally feel like it fits in? Or has the medium stagnated so much that a 10-year-old game can hold its own against the current roster of blockbusters? Consider: Wind Waker features counter-driven combat that almost certainly felt so comfortable to me because of all the Assassin's Creed I've played. Its vast ocean presented a huge open world to explore, like just about every single game announced at this year's E3. It included an in-game photography option, greatly reduced stakes in combat, and a maddening end-game quest that felt like an attempt to pad the play time: All very common elements in contemporary games. Even the graphics haven't been changed that much; Nintendo bumped up the texture quality, added some simple shading to objects, and slapped on a patina of bloom lighting.

At the time of its original release, many gamers rejected The Wind Waker for being too different. I wonder how many will spurn it this time for being too much the same? No matter; I'm eager to revisit the game with its (slightly) new look and try playing it in new and different ways. I didn't think I was, but spending a little time with this remake changed my mind.

This article may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and buy the product we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.

Comments 8

  • Avatar for Wellman #1 Wellman 3 years ago
    Love Wind Waker, still my most favorite (grammer be damned) Zelda game. That being said, as great as this preview makes the Wii U version sound, I am still on the fence.

    Mainly because despite the improvements I am not sure they added enough new features that I should pay full retail. I wish they added at least one new dungeon or remix adventure ala Master Quest to make me feel more at ease.

    Still a marvelous game.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for docexe #2 docexe 3 years ago
    It’s not my favorite game of the series (that tittle still goes to A Link to the Past), but despite a few flaws (like the infamous Triforce fetch quest), it is still an incredible game. It’s also the Zelda game that has better transmitted to me the feel of wonder, adventure and traveling to the unknown.

    I will probably buy it once I finally get a Wii U, but is not exactly the killer app that would make me run to get the system.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for abuele #3 abuele 3 years ago
    I will try to revisit the game again with my nephew Game Cube, for now.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Captain-Gonru #4 Captain-Gonru 3 years ago
    I generally played Zelda games as bow-heavy as I could, but that's more a product of my play style than anything else.
    This game can't come soon enough, frankly. The more I really consider it, Wind Waker may be (make sure you're sitting down) my favorite of the entire series. Which makes no sense, as it's missing many of the "classic" elements. No Epona, no orphan Link (you start out trying to save his sister, after all. The rest comes later.) And yet, with the massive world to explore, the more duel-based (is that a thing?) fighting system, and an ending that (Spoiler Alert) involves Zelda in a much more active role, one could argue that it is the most Zelda game of all.
    By the way, this may be the first article on here with more paragraph notes than traditional comments. Kudos to you, Jeremy, for writing pieces that readers quite literally can't wait to finish to talk about.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Exhuminator #5 Exhuminator 3 years ago
    I've wanted a first person Zelda for as long as Miyamoto has. "At first when we were developing The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, I even proposed using a first-person perspective." http://iwataasks.nintendo.com/interviews/#/wii/crossbow/0/0Edited August 2013 by Exhuminator
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for DeeMer #6 DeeMer 3 years ago
    Yeah, but do you still have to hand-deliver your pics to the trophy guy one by one? I always thought that it would have been much better to have sent them in the mail.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for docexe #7 docexe 3 years ago
    @DeeMer Agghh… I really hope they have streamlined that part. Honestly, I liked the picto box subquest, a shame it didn’t return in later games. But after a while it became grating how you have to go back and forth to the gallery in order to get your pictures rated. I know is very unlikely, but I also can’t help it but hope that they have increased the number of pictures you can save at a time.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for salparadise #8 salparadise 3 years ago
    This was the first game I got with my Panasonic Q when I first moved to Japan. The game was so brilliant and the most fun I've ever had learning kanji (since Zelda games in Japanese have the furigana written above all kanji so even little kids can play).

    While OoT might have been the pinnacle of the series, in many ways I enjoyed Wind Waker (or Kaze no Takuto in Japanese) even more. The cel shading made for such a vibrant environment that I never could get into Twilight Princess due to its dark demeanor.Edited August 2013 by salparadise
    Sign in to Reply

Comments

Close