• Got a Eurogamer account? Your details will work here too!

  • Need an account?

    Create an account. They're free!

  • Forgotten your login details?

    Recover your account here.

Warner Apologizes for Batman's Bugs; Fixes Incoming

If you've been troubled by Arkham Origins' technical issues, fear not; fixes are on the way.

By Pete Davison. Published 5 months ago

Although at heart a solid game, players of Batman: Arkham Origins have discovered the Dark Knight's latest adventure to be a bit of a bug-riddled mess, regardless of which platform you play it on.

Fortunately, the team at Warner Bros. Montreal has been paying close attention to fan feedback on the game's official forums, and is moving to address some of the most pressing issues having issued an official apology. An initial update will be available for all platforms this week, with an additional update to follow for Xbox 360 owners when some further issues have been successfully tracked down and stamped out.

This week's update will address three main problems: a bug that causes some players to be "stuck in an endless loop of falling" or drop through the world; another bug that prevents the "Continue" option from sometimes appearing in the main menu when attempting to pick up where you left off; and an issue whereby FreeFlow Focus mode would not unlock upon reaching Shadow Vigilante rank 3. PC players get an additional fix: those who have found their progress stymied by the Burnley Tower should find themselves able to continue as normal following the fix.

Two Xbox 360 issues remain outstanding, however, and they're big problems in their own right: corrupted saves and crashes. In both cases, Warner Bros. claims to know what is causing the problems, but notes that a "few more days" are needed to validate the problems before releasing the fixes; in the meantime, the team notes that the freezing issues can sometimes be circumvented by playing while not connected to the Internet.

These bugs are all showstoppers that have blocked many players' progress through the game's single-player campaign. Although, as we noted in our review, the core game itself is solid (and possibly the third-best Batman game ever made), it's always extremely disappointing when a game releases on to store shelves and digital storefronts in a state which doesn't reflect well on the developer and publisher. It is good that Warner Bros. is moving to fix the issues as promptly as possible, but for some -- particularly those who have deleted seemingly corrupted saves and started again -- the damage may already have been done.

This incident is the latest in a long line of occasions that beg an interesting question: is it even worth picking up games the moment they're released any more? Arkham Origins' bugs should have been caught and fixed prior to release; instead, Warner Bros. shipped a game with significant issues to be fixed at a later date -- hardly confidence-inspiring, though it is at least gratifying that the problems are being fixed quickly. Couple that with the increasing number of games who follow up their release with swathes of DLC and then an almost-inevitable Game of the Year rerelease down the road, and it's worth asking whether or not it's worth playing something on "day one" these days, or whether it's worth giving big games a few weeks or months to stew. And this isn't even taking into account those who don't, for whatever reason, have their consoles connected to the Internet; they're stuck with an inferior experience until they go online.

What's your take? Is being able to play something the moment it's released worth the troubles that high-profile titles like Arkham Origins sometimes come bundled with? Or would you rather wait until you know the experience is the best it's going to be?

The best community comments so far 11 comments

  • jeremy.parish 5 months ago

    @touchofkiel No, point taken -- though I wouldn't characterize Origins' bugs as "lazy" as they're probably due to the publishers' time table rather than the developers' lack of competence -- but I also think there's some self-correction in the business. When publishers rely on patches to justify rushing games to market, a people notice. There are certainly a number of publishers whose games I won't buy on day one... and with the day-one purchase impulse stifled, I generally wait until they drop in price. Or skip them altogether.

  • jeremy.parish 5 months ago

    @renatocosta90 On the other hand, the "good ol' days" were balanced out by games that shipped with major bugs and simply couldn't be fixed.

  • touchofkiel 5 months ago

    @jeremy.parish It's a double edged sword for sure, but there's no denying that the ability to patch has certainly made bug testing less of a priority for devs.

    Of course, older games couldn't be patched... and newer games are infinitely more complex and expensive... but the things I've been hearing about certain versions of Batman, well, that's just lazy, plain and simple.

View 11 comments

More from USgamer