A Brief History of Games Journalism

Over the past four decades, games journalism has undergone some major evolutions. We look at how it's changed over the years.

Article by Jaz Rignall, .

I've called this piece "The Brief History of Games Journalism," but to be honest, the term "games journalism" doesn't sit particularly well with me. I don't necessarily categorize games writing as journalism per se.

There are elements of journalism in what we do - mostly seen on business-focused and high-end intellectual sites where fact-reporting analysis with little personal interpretation makes sense in terms of professional industry coverage. Consumer-facing sites and publications, on the other hand, tend to be far more enthusiast in nature. While some do try to be a little more reportage than others, most sites are far more entertainment-focused in their tone and style, where you expect the writer to be an ardent proponent of the fundamental subject matter he or she is talking about. The general expectation is that the author of a piece is a knowledgeable advocate about their specialized topic - something that's not always true in journalistic coverage of broad subjects and events.

A spread from the first issue of Electronic Games, 1981. Those screenshots aren't screenshots. They're drawings.

What I've just described are pretty much the traits of what used to be called the "enthusiast press", back when magazines were the only option when it came to video game information. It's a style of reporting that's seen across many different areas of consumer interest, particularly entertainment, and it's a legitimate and accepted form of writing. I just see it as different to the more impartial news-oriented, investigative form of traditional journalism that dates back to the early 18th century.

And speaking of which, the traditional press wasn't particularly interested in video gaming during its early years. It was seen as more a novelty than a genuine form of entertainment. However, when Exidy's Death Race appeared in 1976 featuring gameplay that enabled players to deliberately drive over people, the resultant political furor suddenly got the press very interested. Indeed, it helped set off a decades-long attitude of "games are evil," that still exists in some corners of news journalism and political auspices even today.

The first ever games magazine, CVG, featured type-in BASIC games, which required a lot of patience and perseverance to get working.
The first ever video games magazine.

The Beginning

Back in the mid 70's, there was no dedicated video games press. The closest thing to that was trade periodical Play Meter, launched in 1974, which covered arcade games, but very much from a business angle. The first consumer gaming magazine wouldn't appear for another seven years, when, in November of 1981, British publishing company EMAP launched Computer and Video Games magazine.

Just a couple of weeks later, the first US games magazine appeared in the form of Electronic Games magazine. Founded by the late Bill Kunkel and Arnie Katz, both these pioneering journalists had covered games for Video magazine, but this was the first time a magazine completely dedicated to gaming had been seen in the states.

America's first gaming magazine

In Europe, CVG covered all aspects of video gaming, and also included type-in BASIC listings – simple games that users could input themselves, should they be so inspired. These listings were often long, complex, and sometimes even buggy (wait ‘til next month for the fixes!), and the fruits of the painstaking labor required to enter these reams of BASIC text were often barely worth it. Still, these listings did help hopeful young programmers learn the basics of programming, so they were of use for sure.

In the states, EG focused purely on commercial products, and avoided any aspects of DIY gaming. Where CVG and EG shared common ground, though, was in their style of writing. Since this was the very dawn of games writing, there was no precedent in terms of tone and style of games coverage.

The writers of the era were all trained journalists, and even though they were often games enthusiasts, you can nevertheless see a more classical reporting style coming through in what they wrote in those early days. It was more restrained and less hyperbolic than the style of games journalism that would emerge only a few years later.

Mid 80's European magazine ZZAP! 64 featured comments from three reviewers - often written in highly colorful language - and a comprehensive score. A far cry from early reviews that were more reportage in nature and were score-free.

Evolution One

With an industry that was in the midst of a revolution, and with an audience that was fervent and extremely excited by what was going on, the lack of visceral enthusiasm in existing magazines was seen as an opportunity by the new wave of publications being launched in the mid-80’s – especially in Europe. Magazines created by journalists-turned-gamers began to feel somewhat staid and unexciting. Also, many of the writers of the time didn't necessarily have the in-depth, expert knowledge of their gaming readership – so to fill that gap, magazines began to hire gamers-turned-journalists. Essentially, up-and-coming writers with deep gaming knowledge who could talk to the readership using the same terms and slang they spoke.

A British magazine called Personal Computer Games was one of the first to do this, followed by CRASH magazine – dedicated to the ZX Spectrum micro – which turned things on its head by featuring reviews written by kids local to the magazine’s offices in Ludlow, England. The magazine where I got my first gig, a Commodore magazine called ZZAP! 64, featured a team that was exclusively gamers – which resulted in a magazine filled with slang terms and contemporary phraseology that resonated with gamers.

However, while some more traditional industry folk saw this sort of writing as “amateurish,” the readers responded very positively. Finally, there were magazines that spoke their language and mirrored their enthusiasm. The odd typo and sometimes poorly constructed English didn’t matter: what counted was that these reviewers were "real" gamers who really knew their stuff – and were excited to talk about it.

Of course, not all magazines followed this style. The more news-focused trade and consumer weeklies, and slightly more academic broader interest computer magazines still continued to report in the more traditional journalistic style, essentially resulting in two types of magazines – the "serious" games industry press, and the more hyperbolic consumer/enthusiast gaming press.

Something that's important to note is that at this time, many readers of magazines were quite young. During the 80's, the average age of a computer magazine reader was 16 years old, because kids welcomed gaming with open arms, while adults were much slower on the uptake. This also had a certain influence on European magazines, where younger readers often saw more colorful expression and puerile humor as positives, and weren't shy about writing into magazines and letting the writers know this.

A typical 90's Electronic Games' magazine review page.
Joystik magazine - one of the victims of the video game crash of 1983.
Crash was a highly successful mid-80's British magazine that covered the ZX Spectrum.

Europe's Boom. America's Bust

While Europe was seeing an explosion in evolution one video game magazines, in the States, the opposite was happening. Following the devastating crash of the video games market in 1983, most magazines had closed shop in the wake of marketing spending falling to an almost absolute zero. EG magazine had gone bi-monthly to try to weather the storm, but ended up going out of business in 1985 (although it did eventually have a second run of issues between '92 and '95). The only survivor of the 18 magazines that had been launched pre-crash was Computer Gaming World. However, US publications began to re-appear during the mid to late 80’s, and by the end of the decade were back to full strength, thanks to the likes of Gamepro, Nintendo Power and Electronic Games Monthly.

While the US publishing market picked up the pieces, over in Europe, magazines were flourishing, and their hyperbolic nature had continued to escalate, leading to what sometimes felt like min-maxing of the verbiage used in good and bad reviews. Great games were received with copious praise, whereas poor games were lambasted with language you simply didn’t see echoed across the pond – and indeed don't see written in gaming publications today (but funnily enough, you do often hear spoken by pundits on YouTube – but more about that later). British magazines like Your Sinclair, Amiga Power, and Mean Machines are all examples of publications that pushed the boundaries of humor and reviewing parlance.

The first issue of Game Informer.

Part of the reason why so many magazines in Europe were able to develop their editorial humor to such a degree was simply that the way magazines are published there enabled them to do so. All across Europe, magazine distribution is exceptionally well run and efficient, and popular magazines can literally sell out their entire print run thanks to targeted sales locations and very tight distribution patterns. In the states, distribution was far slower, almost completely untargeted, and far less efficient. At best, publishers could expect to sell around a third of the magazines they printed, and the rest were lost or dumped when they didn’t sell.

What this meant was European magazines could make a profit just by news-stand sales alone, while American magazines were essentially printing three magazines just so they could sell one – and that meant that newsstand profits didn't exist.

EGM was one of the most popular magazines of its era thanks to its enthusiastic tone and style.

Subscriptions were far more popular in the States, but even then, their traditional low cost meant that subscription sales were break even, and not a profit center. Where revenue was generated was in advertising – so as long as a magazine had ads, it was viable. Ads were a source of revenue in Europe too, but they were less important than in the states. Because of that, there was far less pressure put on reviewers and writers when it came to negative coverage of games – because losing ads here and there didn't drastically affect the bottom line; it was considered par for the course to occasionally piss off a publisher/advertiser with poor coverage.

In the US, however, there was far more nervousness about upsetting publishers, because pulled ads put a magazine's bottom line in jeopardy. This resulted in a tempering of language – or simply not covering a game if its coverage would be controversial.

This made some European mags feel more “honest,” simply because there was a perception that writers could say whatever they wanted. However, while this say-what-you-think style helped allude to a feeling of freedom of speech, US magazines were no less honest – they were simply more conservative in their praise and criticism. This did change a little as the 90’s rolled around, and magazines like Gamepro and EGM began to read a little more European-like in their rhetoric. However, the extreme language tended to be used more for the positive than the negative, and the specter of pulled advertising meant that editorial teams still often ran into business and management issues when it came to publishing severely critical pieces.

A spread from British magazine Mean Machines shows the bright color and use of illustrations typical of 1990's European magazine design.
An early IGN home page from 1999. Note the story about "Project Dolphin."
A bright and colorful Gamespot homepage from 1998

The Rise of Digital Publishing

As the 90's wore on, something new emerged – the Internet. The first dedicated gaming web site was launched in November 1994, when print fanzine Game Zero became an online concern. Over the next few years, other small companies launched gaming websites, and major publishing companies, many of whom trepidatiously stepped into this new online publishing world with no idea just how important their websites would eventually become, soon joined them.

In those early days, working on a website wasn't necessarily seen as a prestigious thing, and speaking from first-hand experience, many of the most junior writers at publishing companies were given the reigns to these emergent websites. I was at IGN in 1997 – although wouldn't be called that for another couple of years – and that was most certainly the case for most of the team I managed. Because of this, early Internet writing was seen as haphazard and somewhat amateurish.

The reason for this was that magazines were on a long monthly cycle, and had generally larger, more experienced teams that included Managing and Executive editors who scrutinized pages and ensured that what was printed was as clear and error-free as possible. Not so online, where an often-punishing daily schedule emphasized speed and quantity over quality. This isn’t to disparage online writers – after all, I was one during this period – but cranking out news stories, reviews, tips and whatever else was being published required working far faster and far more prolifically than producing magazine content. Generally speaking, it was self-published work, and as such, far more mistakes were seen, which resulted in the perception that online writing was inferior to print.

However, as we've seen before, consumers are often prepared to put up with a "lesser" product if it's more interesting and convenient than another, and in the case of online, the speed at which information was disseminated was often weeks ahead of print. Slowly, but surely as the millennium turned over, we began to see a dramatic migration of readers out of the traditional print publications to online. While the effects wouldn't truly kick in until the late 00's, the turn of the century was the turning point for magazines. Any publication that didn't have a parallel online publication was in deep trouble.

The Impact of Community Comments

Another major thing happened during this era that would change the nature of online journalism considerably – community commenting. In the early days of the Internet – hard though it is to remember – there was no community commenting. It wasn't until the early 00's when forums and the rise of article-specific commentary began to appear, and that had a huge effect on the way writers wrote.

Before that point, their word was largely gospel. While readers would certainly write in to magazines to give feedback, it required pen, paper and a stamp to do so. That small effort provided a fairly large filter for comments,– simply because throwaway knee-jerk reactions would seem less compelling when someone wrote them out – assuming their words even made it to paper. And even then, comments received by publications were essentially private. Sure, almost every publication printed letters, but they picked and chose what to publish. Ultimately, reader feedback was largely benign and unthreatening.

Online comments, however, were open to everyone – and required almost no effort to write. All of a sudden writers were exposed to every possible opinion from every kind of gamer, from superfans who very likely knew more about the game than the reviewer did, to those who might pick apart the way something was written.

Suddenly, anyone writing particularly vehemently about any topic could become a target for online rage. No matter what your opinion, there was almost always somebody out in the ether who might feel aggravated or enraged by what was said – and the nature of online commenting meant that with just a few keystrokes, they could vent their anger with ease. This had a profound effect on writing. All of a sudden, journalists had to temper their comments, and think about what they were writing far more deeply than they had on magazines. That's not to say magazine writing is thoughtless – far from it. But there was a degree of tempering and self-censorship that went into online writing to ensure that the writer said what he or she wanted to say, but not in a way that would become a lightning rod to their readership.

Some may disagree with my assessment of how community commenting changed games journalism, and there are always exceptions to the rule, but for the most part, I believe the rise of community commenting did have an effect on many writers and what they wrote – and not necessarily a negative one. Sure, community comments themselves can be a nightmare, but the realization that people were watching and scrutinizing what was being written ensured that writers paid more attention to what they said, and indeed how they said it.

Edge magazine is credited for helping raise the standards of gaming journalism and magazine design through the 90's into the 00's.

New Games Journalism

Another influential change to games journalism came in 2004 when British journalist Kieron Gillen wrote a post on his blog about new games journalism. Here, he essentially challenged the status quo, and talked about New Journalism applied to video game writing.

It was an interesting piece, and one that resonated particularly with "quality" gaming sites and magazines who wanted to move beyond the rather stale two-decade-old standard established in the early days of games journalism, and elevate games writing to something more erudite and worthy. Not all sites changed their tone, but we did see the rise of a generation of new journalists who wrote deeper, more thoughtful pieces in magazines like PC Gamer and Edge, and later, we'd see more academic writing on the likes of 1UP, Polygon and Grantland.

Games journalism has come a long way since its early days of print. Since then it's evolved into an online product, and is now in the process of a third evolution into video. Will that put "traditional" websites out of business? Depends on who you ask, but generally speaking the prognosis is that there might be some changes to the current landscape, but there will always be a demand for the written word - even though it might be far smaller than the demand for information on video.
Gamepro issue one.
The last issue of Gamepro magazine.
A Game Informer cover of the 90's reflects a far younger outlook than it does today.
The modern, more sophisticated Game Informer - one of the few games mags still in business.

The Rise of YouTube and Twitch

The cycle of games coverage evolution has continued in recent years with the rise of YouTube and Twitch. This is the most significant challenge to the status quo since the advent of the Internet.

In the same way that "real gamers" changed the style and tone of coverage during games journalism's early years, so too are the new breed of "influencers" – gamers who've taken to YouTube and Twitch to cover games on a digital video format.

These new media folk essentially filled a gap that was not being effectively addressed by major publishers – very personal, specialized, or non-traditional takes on video gaming on digital video format. More importantly, they also provided an alternative form of gaming information consumption for younger gamers who were less interested in reading the mostly text output of the traditional press, and instead wanted to watch and listen to people play and talk about games.

At this point, it goes without saying that as a viewership number, the influencers on YouTube and Twitch now command an audience far larger than that of the more traditional gaming press. Just how much of an impact this will have on the publishing landscape remains to be seen. Most large publishers have their own YouTube material now, and some are extremely successful – but the fact of the matter is that a new, younger generation of gamers is growing up watching video games and video gaming information, and are less interested in reading about it.

What that means over the long term is a probable shakeout of the traditional media. YouTube and Twitch viewerships already dwarf the readers of old-school gaming media, and games publishers are now spending just as much time courting influencers as they are gaming journalists. That's not going to affect coverage too much, but what will is marketing spending. The traditional gaming press is essentially supported by advertising and marketing dollars from publishers – as it always has been – but if that support begins to be pulled in favor of spending money with influencers, or because it's seen as not worth it, that will have a radical effect on the current publishing landscape.

The interesting thing is that the influencers don't necessarily play by the same rules or follow the same standards as the traditional gaming media. There have already been examples of paid coverage of product by major influencers, and they're not always up-front about their editorial standards, and the nature of their coverage. That's understandable, since they're not journalists by trade, and indeed their viewership mightn't necessarily care about that, but the fact that most traditional outlets follow a published set of standards is something that essentially sets them apart from influencers.

Ultimately, regardless of official standards or lack thereof, I think however games journalism, and indeed the new breed of influencers evolve, it's critical that whatever is said or written is underpinned by full disclosure, so that viewers and readers know exactly what it is that they're watching or reading. That way it's clear whether the coverage being provided is independent, paid for – or whatever muddied waters lie in between.

This article may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and buy the product we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.

Comments 41

Comments on this article are now closed. Thanks for taking part!

  • Avatar for JohnnyBarnstorm #1 JohnnyBarnstorm 3 years ago
    Video Games & Computer Entertainment and Dragon Magazine were my go-to magazines for reviews. They were intelligent and insightful, and were full of slightly bizarre retrospectives of how much better games used to be. I always felt like GamePro was for kids, due to the horrible comics and Happy Face review scores. I was one judgey 10 year old.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for whitestreak #2 whitestreak 3 years ago
    Very interesting piece. I remember reading some of your articles in the old days of C&VG, though the haphazard distribution in Norway back in the day meant that I only got hold of the occasional issue.

    What I'd like to know more about concerns your own work in magazines: thinking back, I had the impression that some magazines had a clear tendency to be very positive about the games they reviewed, whereas others (I seem to remember (Nintendo magazine) Total being a prime example) were generally very strict with their scores. My question is: you say that the European gaming press was generally ad-independent. But was there a clearly defined editorial policy with regards to how much was required to give a game a good score, or were you completely free to do what you liked?
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for cldmstrsn #3 cldmstrsn 3 years ago
    Its funny how you mentioned commenting in this piece. I believe it has gone downhill since anyone and their mother can comment on something. I was talking to a friend just the other day how I wish some sites would get rid of their comment sections and just bring back mailbags. Those were a lot of fun and it seemed that the excitement of the writer would make things all the more exciting rather than seeing a thousand "mehs" at the bottom of the page.
    Its kind of amazing how most games still get me excited and other people just want to crap all over it over the smallest details. I try not to let it get to me but I grew up on the NES and SNES and so to see the industry move into some of the graphics I have seen blows me away still so it just surprises me to see people go "meh".Edited 2 times. Last edited December 2014 by cldmstrsn
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for jeremy.parish #4 jeremy.parish 3 years ago
    @nimzy But "Time to crate" was from a website, Old Man Murray.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Daryoon #5 Daryoon 3 years ago
    Talking of old school gaming magazines and the modern trend of Youtube/Twitch et al reminds of when Mean Machines came with a Street Fighter 2 VHS, consisting of a certain Jaz Rignall and a bloke whose name I can't remember (Gary?) commentating as the latter played through the game.

    An early example of a Let's Play, if not one of the earliest? Who would have thought something like that would be the norm now?!
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for terile #6 terile 3 years ago
    An interesting historical roundup that brought back some fond memories.
    I disagree with the separation of written and video as "journalism" and "influencer". Irrespective of the medium they present themselves in, they are both ultimately responsible for what they say/write in the same way. I dread to use the phrase "journalistic ethics" in the current climate, but yes, both are equally responsible for the material they put out being fair and free of undue influence.

    I see the difference between the two as a difference in maturity - there simply aren't well-established brands and formats for video reviews. Written reporting is mostly a continuation of a well-established format, despite the changes that going online has made. Video reporting on the other hand is NOT a continuation of traditional tv journalism by other means, because the cost of broadcast is essentially zero, so people are freer to spend time showing the material - the culmination of this is "let's play" videos. Imagine a film review that was 1.5 hours of someone talking about the film while you watched it. You would definitely be able to fit in a lot of information, but watching the film might be less exciting afterwards.

    Both will continue to exist. I've recently been enjoying Ben & Gabriels "Let's drown out", on youtube, which can meander freely from discussing the game being played to any topic they choose.
    On the other hand, it's also nice to read the more in-depth analytical written material, like the article above. Neither would work in the other medium.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Captain-Gonru #7 Captain-Gonru 3 years ago
    Nintendo Power was the first magazine I can remember in this vein. There was one kid in school with a subscription, and we'd all gather once a month to pour over every glorious page.
    Later, there was a website I used to visit for hints and tips., I think, run by a guy whose picture was quintessentially gaming nerd (Al Alamoo, or something like that).
    I tried explaining this to my eight year old nephew recently, and he couldn't wrap his head around not getting a YouTube walkthrough for a game you got stuck in.
    Damn kids.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for brionfoulke91 #8 brionfoulke91 3 years ago
    My favorite gaming magazine will always be Diehard Gamefan. No other gaming magazine was ever able to match the raw passion for games that they had. It feels like that passion is often missing from games journalism today, and I miss it.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for hal9k #9 hal9k 3 years ago
    Excellent piece, this covered a lot of history that I really wasn't aware of. My first gaming-related magazine (perhaps my first subscription of any kind) was RUN, a C64 magazine which included those type-in BASIC programs. I only ever got a Space Invaders clone working, but that was pretty satisfying. I just looked it up, and the above-mentioned Arnie Katz was a contributor. RUN was also the 2nd fastest growing US magazine of 1985 ("if these trends continue...eyy!"). From there, I guess I've gone to Nintendo Power, then Gamespot under Greg Kasavin, then 1UP, then here.

    Videos are nice and have their place, but I worry about them replacing text reviews and articles like this. My opinion's mostly based on my own usage patterns. I do most of my web browsing on a phone and/or at work or otherwise in public where I can read and comment, but can't really watch a video. I can listen to podcasts while driving, but video's not the best idea. Video walkthroughs? It's a lot faster to search for what I want in an ASCII text file FAQ. Kids these days need to read a book, and get off my lawn.

    I first heard the term "New Games Journalism" with respect to Dan Hsu's relatively tough interview of Peter Moore about the Xbox 360 launch. It's hard to believe that was almost 10 years ago. Does anyone have an opinion on what that term means today, if anything?Edited December 2014 by hal9k
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Jonny5Alive7 #10 Jonny5Alive7 3 years ago
    A really interesting article, great writing.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for aaronjohntreble51 #11 aaronjohntreble51 3 years ago
    Great article, Jaz. Mean Machines Sega was my go-to magazine as a kid. Now days, it's IGN and reading your stuff. Passion and enthusiasm is always a good thing. Put that together with today's technology and anyone can follow their dream. Sure, there's loads more crap, but also loads more chances to find people YOU like. I like it.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for EnderTZero #12 EnderTZero 3 years ago
    Great article. Now let's have one on the history of ethics.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Dajji77 #13 Dajji77 3 years ago
    Good grief this article is all over the place! Headings, subheadings, asides, inserts, more headings. Jumps forwatd and back and forward in time. I literally can't read this.


    ...would be much preferred.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for SargeSmash #14 SargeSmash 3 years ago
    Great article!

    I was one of those kids that would bring magazines to school. Stacks of them. I might have been slightly obsessive... I'd be drawing stuff in the magazines and whatnot, and reading them over and over.

    My absolute favorite was Nintendo Power. I got to the NES pretty late, and my school was small, so there weren't many folks still into it, but it really didn't matter to me. I also snagged issues of EGM, GamePro, and a few others along the way. NP still always impressed me the most, although the insanely colorful GameFan always impressed me.

    I'm still not sure how I feel about the rise of video commentary. On one hand, it's pretty cool that I can see footage from a game on demand, but on the other hand, I can get a lot more information more efficiently through a written review. And it's not like many of the commenters out there are spouting quality verbiage in the first place. I do suspect that we'll see that part of the craft improve over time as well.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Monkey-Tamer #15 Monkey-Tamer 3 years ago
    I had a subscription to Nintendo Power. It went from giving tips and maps to being almost all a showcase for upcoming games once Nintendo realized people would pay for individual strategy guides. I remember getting it in the mailbox was like Christmas multiple times a year.

    My wife and I just watched the new South Park where the focus is on youtube commentary. I told her we're getting old. A youtube review? Yes. Hours watching someone else play a game? Not happening.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Exhuminator #16 Exhuminator 3 years ago
    Awesome article.

    I miss Sushi X.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Daryoon #17 Daryoon 3 years ago
    Actually, another thing that's crossed my mind in regards to modern Youtubey trends is: did the US have a history of video game television shows, like we had in the UK with programs like Games Master, Bad Influence, and Games World? They almost seem ahead of their time now, as embarrassing as some of them seem...
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for finalhour #18 finalhour 3 years ago
    Thanks for this article, I grew up with gaming mags and always enjoy reminiscing. It was interesting to read more about the differences is EU and US publishing and why the former was so much more successful. I always wondered how magazines like Edge were able to put out huge, awesome issues every month while their North American brethren were dying off.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Kat.Bailey #19 Kat.Bailey 3 years ago
    @Daryoon Just GamePro TV, really. And there were game shows like Nick Arcade and Video Power.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Jaz_Rignall #20 Jaz_Rignall 3 years ago
    @Dajji77 Are you reading it on a mobile device or on a bigger screen?
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Lord-Bob-Bree #21 Lord-Bob-Bree 3 years ago
    This article feels like it goes light on traditional press's relation to companies, while being questioning of new media's.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Very impressive and interesting article for a video game website
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Dajji77 #23 Dajji77 3 years ago
  • Avatar for airbagfin51 #24 airbagfin51 3 years ago
    So many tears and feels.


    I suppose this lets you off for not covering the Driveclub weather patch and consequently placing the game *above* Forza. (we go there) =)
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Jaz_Rignall #25 Jaz_Rignall 3 years ago
    @airbagfin51 If truth be told, I haven't played that yet. I'll give it a go tonight. I was so bummed about the problems I went through reviewing it (and subsequently trying to play it thereafter) I essentially shelved the game. I should go back and give it another go. I wanted to really like the game after all - I should give it a second chance.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Jaz_Rignall #26 Jaz_Rignall 3 years ago
    @Dajji77 Ah ok. I'll have a chat with our devs and ask them about making the sidebars work more effectively on mobile. I just looked at it on my iPhone and yes, it's a sub-optimal experience to say the least. Works fine on desktop because the sidebars run alongside the text, and you can read it as one continuous piece.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for airbagfin51 #27 airbagfin51 3 years ago
    @Jaz_Rignall I hope you know I jest, of course. Man. I was one of those kids--nay--consumers reading your stuff waaay back.

    You guys were gods back then: "Who are these people who get to play Streetfighter II before all of us?"

    Well, you're sort of gods now too. Better gods =)
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Jaz_Rignall #28 Jaz_Rignall 3 years ago
    @airbagfin51 Lol! Cheers. I thought you were, but I'm definitely serious about giving Driveclub a go. It's good to have a breather after being hyped for a game all year, and then it literally falling to pieces in front of your face as you review it. What a disappointment!

    And Street Fighter II? Yeah. That was quite the privilege getting to play that (and indeed having a machine in our office). Working at Mean Machines was every bit the laugh it looked like we were having when you read the magazine! Definitely the most favorite period of my career.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for airbagfin51 #29 airbagfin51 3 years ago

    It's so much easier to share things these days.Edited December 2014 by airbagfin51
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for docexe #30 docexe 3 years ago
    This was a fantastic article, brought back good memories from the golden age of game magazines.

    Here at the south of the border, the first specialized magazine I ever read was Club Nintendo, which was essentially the equivalent of Nintendo Power, made specifically for the Mexican and Latin American markets. From then on there have been lots of magazines: Atomix, Game Master, Master Player, Gamers, Xbox Player, the “tropicalized” versions of GamePro, EGM, Edge, N64, Play Station Max, Play Station Power, the Spain imported HobbyConsolas….

    Sadly, most of them are defunct now or have moved to online exclusively. The only magazines I still see in stands these days are Club Nintendo, Game Master and XboxPlayer. Makes me feel nostalgic for that bygone era.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Confidence_Trick #31 Confidence_Trick 3 years ago
    The Mega Game accolade. I remember that :)

    I also had no idea that CVG was our first proper video game magazine. Interesting.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for toddbeaton04 #32 toddbeaton04 3 years ago
    My favorite gaming magazine was Next Generation
    \ December 2014 by toddbeaton04
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for kantaroo3 #33 kantaroo3 3 years ago
    Great article. It covered European magazines mostly from a UK angle but it sounds like a lot of the same applies to other countries. In Spain when I was growing up I read Micro Mania every month, and its sister Micro Hobby very regularly. The former focused on the systems that dominated the Spanish market (ZX Spectrum and Amstrad CPC) but had some coverage of other systems (C64 & MSX, eventually Amiga etc.) I had a complete collection for 5 years, then it was thrown away by mistake in a house move... ;(

    Speaking of, I think it is interesting how magazines used to focus on only one system, and often publishers would have sister mags focusing on different ones. Now you can get a broader view of the industry.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for InsertTokenz #34 InsertTokenz 3 years ago
    The 3 gaming magazines I really enjoyed from my childhood were Nintendo Power, Super Play (I was able to buy the odd issue here and there despite not living in the UK), and Diehard GameFan. All of them delivered on being entertaining reads and providing info on so many great games coming out during that time.Edited June 2015 by InsertTokenz
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Fourwisemen #35 Fourwisemen 3 years ago

    I couldn't agree more with your attention for and appreciation of Superplay. I'm a UK resident and adored this magazine, it's humour, crazy art style and attention on Japan which at that time really was the centre of the gaming universe.

    I really was saddened when it disappeared and wish I had some of my issues still to hand.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for unoclay #36 unoclay 3 years ago
    Wild stuff. Interesting JOURNALISM on display here!
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Seb-SE #37 Seb-SE 3 years ago
    Fantastic article. Thanks so much for writing it!

    Reading UK/US magazines was a big part of my formative years and I do feel a nostalgic twinge when I think about them and the hours I poured into them as a kid.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Seb-SE #38 Seb-SE 3 years ago
    Also, just to add that I recently learned that New Age Gaming (NAG), a South African publication I grew up with, is shutting down soon and key writers moving over to IGN Africa (so I heard).
    Sigh, the last great gaming mag has finally, inevitably, unthinkably been beaten by the steady march of progress.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for pertusaria #39 pertusaria 2 years ago
    Brilliant article - cheers!

    (I read and enjoyed it back when it was first posted, but apparently I didn't write in to show my appreciation.)
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for gregorypatton #40 gregorypatton A year ago
    Great article on games journalism including the social media info sites like youtube and all.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for sanusense #41 sanusense A year ago
    I have been reading gaming journos for a long time and believe the necessity of these authors in the gaming world. - Pick a New Bike

    Thanks for all the effort!
    Sign in to Reply