Sections

Gaming Auteurs: Akitoshi Kawazu

No one in the world makes RPGs quite like those of Final Fantasy's quirkiest co-designer... for better, and for worse.

Profile by Jeremy Parish, .

Games have so many moving parts, it's often impossible for one person's singular vision to shine through the many layers of content. But sometimes, we get lucky.

When people think of the auteur concept as it relates to video games, they usually call to mind directors with an obsession for film and narrative: David Cage, Hidetaka Suehiro, Goichi Suda, Rockstar's Houser brothers, maybe Ken Levine. Video games aren't simply glorified movies, though; their interactive element makes them unique, and designers can leave their mark on the medium with systems and mechanics just as meaningfully as they can with immersive narrative.

Bob recently wrote about the driving inspiration behind the work of Hideki Kamiya's work — his obsession with the nuts-and-bolts of his action games, and his careful attention to player interaction and feedback. Being more of an RPG fan myself, though, the design auteur whose work most speaks to me is Square Enix's Akitoshi Kawazu. Despite his work's unique qualities deriving almost entirely from its mechanical features, Kawazu's oeuvre couldn't be further from Kamiya's.

However, both men seem equally likely to fill an RPG will demonic drag racers. So there's that.

Some history, first. Along with fellow Famicom Final Fantasy collaborator Hiroyuki Itou, Kawazu is the last of Square Enix's true old guard, having joined Square back in the mid '80s and first making a name for himself by directing Rad Racer and co-designing the very first Final Fantasy — two of the first three Square games to make it to the U.S. The success of the latter game and its crucial role in keeping the struggling company from hitting rock-bottom gave its team of creators considerable influence within Square, which translated to the freedom to create games as they saw fit.

That newfound liberty saw many different expressions. Final Fantasy lead designer Hironobu Sakaguchi continued his efforts to make role-playing games less arcane, more accessible, and more exciting. Meanwhile, Koichi Ishii and Hiromichi Tanaka drifted in a complementary direction, adding RPG depth to action games with the Mana series. Kawazu, however, went off on his own tangent; he designed RPGs, but they were RPGs like no one else made.

Fundamentally, Kawazu's key interest lies has always been in taking video game RPGs back to their tabletop roots. Whereas the general direction of Japanese RPG design is to push more toward the feeling of visual novels or anime supplemented by stats-based systems, Kawazu's games treat narrative more as an incidental consideration. Ultimately, his works serve as sandboxes in which players can experiment with systems that could best be described as "idiosyncratic."

"When I design games, I analyze elements of board games and how they work," Kawazu once told me. "It is at the foundation of a lot of the games I make."

His peers clearly recognized or intuited this fascination from the beginning and assigned him to appropriate tasks — and he rose to the occasion. On the original Final Fantasy, he says, he "was mainly in charge of the battle system and battle sequences. For that, I tried to make it as close to Dungeons & Dragons as possible. That was my goal.

"There are certain precepts when it comes to a Dungeons & Dragons type of environment, a western role-playing experience. Like 'zombies are weak against fire,' or 'monsters made of fire are weak against ice.' If you think about it a little, they all make sense, and these are all things that D&D already sets up. Certain things are weak against certain other things and strong against yet other things. They all have these relationships. Up until that point, Japanese RPGs were ignoring all of that. They didn't incorporate those elements."

Kawazu's influence in the original Final Fantasy played a key role in shaping the future of console RPGs. Other Famicom RPGs of the era took their cues from Dragon Quest, where spells had no elemental traits — magic could hurt, heal, or stun, but the idea of innate strengths and weaknesses and targeted attacks never factored in. Even the original Megami Tensei, whose sequels largely revolve around hitting enemy weaknesses, offered a barebones, Dragon Quest-like assortment of magic for its spellcaster to use. In the wake of Final Fantasy, however, the rock-paper-scissors of elemental affinities and spell groupings became standard issue for RPGs.

Despite his influential design decisions and prolific creative streak, most American gamers didn't get a proper taste of Kawazu's quirky design sensibilities for another decade. His projects — namely the Romancing SaGa trilogy for Super NES — never made their way West. Neither did the Final Fantasy sequel he directed, Final Fantasy II; it was passed over for localization, along with Final Fantasy III, in favor of jumping ahead to a renamed Final Fantasy IV. And while his two projects that did see English versions (the first two Final Fantasy Legend games) were decidedly unconventional RPGs, it was easy to write off that strangeness as an attribute of their portable nature. Of course Game Boy RPGs would be weird, we assumed, because the system itself was so underpowered and limited!

Exposition, or just the game taunting you?

Early in 1998, however, Square and Sony published SaGa Frontier for PlayStation in America. Having recently been turned on to the concept of RPGs by the wildly successful Final Fantasy VII, a remarkable number of role-playing neophytes flocked to what was sure to be the next amazing work from the creators of FFVII. They were promptly bewildered. SaGa Frontier lacked the stunning visuals of FFVII, along with its cinematic presentation, larger-than-life characters, and bold in medias res introduction.

In fact, it lacked something as simple as a basic sense of direction or purpose. SaGa Frontier told seven different stories with seven different protagonists, playable in any different order. Some were lengthy adventures, while others could theoretically be completed in a matter of hours. Most quests overlapped with one another, covering much of the same ground, even allowing you to recruit main characters from other storylines as party members. The world consisted of a hodgepodge of influences ranging from surreal fantasy to pan-Asian cyberpunk cities ripped straight from the pages of a William Gibson novel.

And then there was the battle system. The characters had such weird traits! Monsters would mutate seemingly at random. Party members would fall in battle but immediately stand up again, despite having zero HP, only to suffer some weird new form of damage that eventually led to their permanent death. Occasionally characters would learn new skills denoted by a little light bulb above their heads, sometimes performing combo maneuvers with the rest of their team. But always — universally — without warning.

While FFVII built to a certain degree on Kawazu's love for core tabletop mechanics to create something accessible and fun, SaGa Frontier embodied a different passion: Discovery and evolution. Kawazu's games, above all, find unity in their emphasis on character growth through player action. In offering the player extensive choices and opportunities. And most of all, in never once explaining how on earth all these things work together.

A quick survey of Kawazu's body of work reveals the truth of this. Final Fantasy II, for which Kawazu took the reins as lead designer, abandoned character levels and traditional level-ups in favor of incremental improvements based on individual party members' performance and actions in combat. The Final Fantasy Legend games — actually the earliest entries in the same series as SaGa Frontier — mixed things up by making some characters solidly predictable and others subject to what appeared to be random transformations. The Legend of Mana introduced a huge array of seemingly superfluous systems (such as building golems and farming pets) that did little to affect the core game but offered potentially vast rewards to those who took the time to master their intricacies. The Last Remnant applied the principles of SaGa to large-scale warfare. And Unlimited Saga was weird even for a SaGa title, a virtual board game with wildly unpredictable outcomes for each turn.

And yet, for those who take the time to properly sort out how everything in these games fit together, Kawazu's games offer addicting depth and substance. The biggest crime his games commit is ultimately not to offer much guidance to the player (or, in some cases, any guidance at all), leaving those who happen upon these creations to struggle through the fundamentals themselves.

The 16-bit Romancing SaGa titles never came to America, meaning we missed out on some of Kawazu's best-received creations.

Perhaps that's why Kawazu's best-received works to date have been the ones that make their expectations self-evident; the PlayStation 2 remake of Romancing SaGa, for example, featured all the idiomatic excess of Kawazu's standard fare but did a great job of explicating it to players. Likewise, the (sadly Japan-only) remakes of the Final Fantasy Legend trilogy took pains to lend some transparency to previously baffling features — something as simple as giving a preview of the results of monster mutation went a long way toward reducing the frustration of those games.

Perhaps not surprisingly, the most successful of Kawazu's creations in the West have been the Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles games. In many ways, they're the opposite of SaGa; there, abilities like magic derive self-evidently from equipment, and character levels have a diminished but predictable role. Even so, the original Chronicles had his fingerprints all over it in the form of the strange "bucket" mechanic that required player parties to drag an artifact with them at all times to provide their heroes with a zone of safety in which they could act without penalties. This ultimately proved for many to be a frustrating and limiting design choice... but it sure didn't resemble any kind of mechanic seen in any other RPG.

What makes Akitoshi Kawazu's work so interesting is its deliberate refusal to fall into step with trends and traditions. His design choices often come across as counter-intuitive, even destructive, seemingly crafted to annoy and frustrate the player. He's clearly a man working to his own distinctive vision, designing games that suit his own tastes and whims. At times, this can result in something approaching genius; at others, it merely confuses. He's the Ed Wood of game design, crafting bizarre and sometimes even unplayable works that nevertheless display a spark of genuine, if slightly mad, creative passion. His works are as punishing and bizarre as the man himself is quiet and good-natured.

There is no other game designer who shares Kawazu's unique design obsessions. And while that can make his creations frustrating, it also makes them wonderfully fascinating as well. Though his role at Square Enix is more that of executive than designer these days, we can always hold out hope that he hasn't produced the last of his inexplicable, unintuitive RPG concoctions. Game auteurs are too precious to squander on the boardroom.

This article may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and buy the product we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.

Comments 18

Comments on this article are now closed. Thanks for taking part!

  • Avatar for Exhuminator #1 Exhuminator 4 years ago
    My favorite underrated game Akitoshi Kawazu was involved with is The Crystal Bearers on Wii. What a wonderful wacky wild game that is. Totally unique and totally fun and sometimes totally confusing. That's the Kawazu way baby.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for cldmstrsn #2 cldmstrsn 4 years ago
    What things did Kawazu change in FF XII that made it controversial? FF XII is my favorite FF ( I am currently going through it yet again and trying to do a 100% run through) and im not sure what he changed.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for brionfoulke91 #3 brionfoulke91 4 years ago
    Wow, great article! Kawazu is a really interesting game designer. I love how he is constantly experimenting and trying new things, even if those experiments don't always work out. We could use more Kawazu's today.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for andrewmayes78 #4 andrewmayes78 4 years ago
    @cldmstrsn I'm not really sure, but if I had to guess, it had something to do with shifting the narrative focus from Basch/Ashe to Vaan. Square was worried that a FF game focused on "older" characters wouldn't be appealing enough to the franchise's target audience (i.e. teenagers), and so Vaan and Penelo were inserted into the story to give the story the plucky teenager vibe. Problem was that they weren't integrated into the story very well, and end up doing little to nothing of real significance for the entire game. Worse, since Vaan is the point-of-view character, you're stuck doing all his pointless little errands while Basch and Ashe are no doubt off doing things much more important and interesting.

    I doubt this was entirely Kawazu's decision, and there's likely much more Kawazu changed. But this is all I can really say for sure that the article could be referring to, so don't take my word on it.Edited November 2014 by andrewmayes78
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for TernBird #5 TernBird 4 years ago
    @cldmstrsn I'd imagine it would have something to do with the battle system. Many players disliked XII's "FF XI"-style system. It might also have to do with the license board.

    Latter-day FF games were really divisive, but FFXII really took the cake.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for jeremy.parish #6 jeremy.parish 4 years ago
    @TernBird Nah, Hiroyuki Itou (of FFV and Tactics fame) was the guy behind the battle system. Kawazu basically had the task of pulling everything together and shipping it, and there are some decidedly rough patches to the game, especially toward the end.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Elliot-Gay #7 Elliot-Gay 4 years ago
    I love the first two SaGa titles, but man Kawazu has a wacky spectrum of games under his belt.

    Like them or dislike them, his games were at least fascinating.

    Great piece!
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for cldmstrsn #8 cldmstrsn 4 years ago
    Thank you very much for those views. I never had a problem with Vaan and Penelo. I thought it worked better because you saw all these changes in Ivalice through the eyes of everyday citizens of Rabanastre and happen to get caught up in this huge event but I can see that. I do have to add that I think its odd people view Vaan as the main character as the whole story works as an ensemble and if anything Ashe is the main character. I think people have this mind set of where they play a character in a battle then they are the main character but then that would technically make Reks the main character which we all know he is not and since you can swap anybody out to be the lead in battle technically you can make any character in the party the "main" character. I mean Balthier is one of the main antagonists son and has history there. Anyways I should stop there cause I could write an entire book about this haha.Edited November 2014 by cldmstrsn
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for SatelliteOfLove #9 SatelliteOfLove 4 years ago
    Vaan was earlier; Matsuno has mentioned him being a White Mage (recruitable? I need to collect his interviews sometime for reference), thrust into that Relatable To 7-17 Japanese Boys demographic that fuckin' Wada was fixated on cornering. Much of the grand themes and side plots (like sky pirates, airships, and crystals) were backseat-driven into the game before Matsuno bailed out.

    As far as I can tell, Kawazu did as YoshiP and Tabata did later: show up and be the single, defining hand to keep the ship off the rocks that the many hands had steered it into before once the cold reality of artificial dysfunction and too much money at stake brought about in recent SE's history over and over again.

    Basch is the main character of that game. Never forget. Never EVER forget.

    Anyways, I respect his adherence to indifference, a flavor that is in disasterously low supply in this era of people desperate to know of things but not to know things.

    Now, if he'd just make one game that WORKS logically and consistantly...Edited 2 times. Last edited November 2014 by SatelliteOfLove
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Y7748837 #10 Y7748837 4 years ago
    I look forward to the next round of Kawazu games to come out of Square Enix: Lightning Frontier, Unlimited Lightning, and the one that has by far the most support from the dev team, Romancing Lightning.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Lord-Bob-Bree #11 Lord-Bob-Bree 4 years ago
    I have to say that I like a lot of his games (though I've heard bad things about how unforgiving of mistakes Unlimited SaGa is). It always feels like there's so much to discover, work out, and experiment with. SaGa Frontier especially seems to have that (though I've never really done much with Minstrel Song). The Last Remnant, though it can feel like it's difficult to control what's going on before you understand it, is another really good one.

    Negatively, though, his games can feel lacking in other ways. His worlds and stories can sometimes feel empty and disjointed, and once you've worked out the systems well enough, it can seem like there's a lot of useless extra stuff.

    EDIT: With that said, Final Fantasy Legend did story and world quite right.Edited November 2014 by Lord-Bob-Bree
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for kidgorilla #12 kidgorilla 4 years ago
    I had no idea Kawazu worked on The Last Remnant. Now I kinda want to play it.

    I've always loved those watercolor paintings on the covers of the old Sa Ga games, too. I should look for a gallery of thoseEdited 2 times. Last edited November 2014 by kidgorilla
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for SargeSmash #13 SargeSmash 4 years ago
    I like The Last Remnant, but I'm stuck in it. It's actually more accessible than a lot of his offerings.

    My personal favorite is Final Fantasy Legend II. Such a fantastic RPG, and there are no qualifiers that I put on it. And as good as the remake is, I still haven't really gotten into it, which is strange.

    Anyway, good times trying to snag the Seven Sword at the end, too. That took a while.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Thad #14 Thad 4 years ago
    Yeah, whatever Kawazu's weaknesses, his work is never boring.

    I've been poking around a fan translation of the DS remake of SaGa 2. It's a lot friendlier than it was the first time. And it's got DQ9-style random encounters, which I really prefer to the unavoidable kind.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for EnderTZero #15 EnderTZero 4 years ago
    @jeremy.parish The plot's climax and resolution are easily the weakest parts of that game. Although I did really like how the politics ended in some sort of unsettling (for an RPG story) detente - we're independent, for now! But still tiny and sandwiched between two empires!
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for SatelliteOfLove #16 SatelliteOfLove 4 years ago
    @kidgorilla

    The pleasant, exhilirating audio-visual assault of SF2 was a delight, even if the clearly-underbaked design decisions snapped me out of their embrace on the regular.

    Mmmmm...Hamauzu goodness...
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Vonlenska #17 Vonlenska 4 years ago
    @kidgorilla

    Tomomi Kobayashi was the staple artist for the SaGa series that did all of the very lovely concept, cover and promotional art. I am especially fond of her work for the first SaGa Frontier; here's a tiny gallery of some of my favorites. And, yes, Masashi Hamauzu's score for SF2 is wonderful. The "Piano Pieces SF2" album is especially beautiful.

    I always thought Kobayashi and Hamauzu made a nice pairing. A shame they didn't both work on anything else, really.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for mayazoe #18 mayazoe A year ago
    Where wireless routers and speeds are concerned, price is not always the best controlling factor. There's a wide variety of wireless routers available in the market and one is not always as good as the other. Basic, low-range types gives you speeds of only about 56 mbps.cnc Description here
    Sign in to Reply

Comments

Close