GTA V. Love the Game. The Characters? Not so Much.

Are you enjoying GTA V's story and listening to everything the characters have to say? Or are you only interested in the action?

Article by Jaz Rignall, .

One of my biggest issues with GTA IV was that I didn’t like Niko Bellic very much. I thought his story was interesting, if sometimes a little contrived, but I just didn’t think his character was particularly compelling, and some of his choices seemed flawed. I did play the game through to both its conclusions, but long before I reached them, I’d lost the plot and was treating each mission simply as the next level of a video game. I didn’t care who lived or died. I just enjoyed the proceedings as a practical video gaming exercise, motivated only by my interest in seeing what I might have to do next, and not caring at all why I might be doing it, or how it might affect the story.

I’m having a similar issue with GTA V. The three characters are all stereotypes to varying degrees, and I’m not feeling much empathy towards them. Franklin is probably my least disliked character, and that’s largely because he’s written with a sense of humor. While clichéd, his dialog has some funny moments, and his interactions with his cronies can be entertaining (if sometimes feeling weirdly 90's). Michael, however, I find very unsympathetic. While I believe I’m supposed to perhaps feel bad for his awful situation, it almost seems like he brought it all on himself for being such a douche, and now he’s stuck with it. And as for Trevor – he’s perhaps one of the most repellent main characters of any video game ever.

It's clear that GTA's trio of characters are all morally flawed. But could the storyline have been made more engaging through characters who are a little more sympathetic?

If the trio had been based a little more around the good, the bad and the ugly, I think that might have brought out more compelling character interactions between the different personality types. At least you might have a character that you can get behind. But for the most part, the GTA V gang is bad and ugly. Perhaps one or more of the characters might demonstrate some redeeming qualities later on in the game, but I’m already past the point of caring. Like the last game, I’m already skipping every cutscene I can, and playing through the game mission by mission. Don’t get me wrong – I’m having an absolute blast for sure. But all I want to know is what I need to do next, so I can get on with it and have fun, and not be reminded that I’m playing characters I do not aspire to be at best, and flat-out despise at worst.

Ultimately, this is an upshot of GTA’s basic structure, which has pretty much always been centered around a story that’s essentially on rails. The player looks at the world through the protagonist’s eyes, completing whatever tasks are necessary to advance to the next piece of plot. I have no issue with that per se – Red Dead Redemption, one of my favorite games this generation, follows this exact same structure. But while I loved RDR’s storyline, felt empathy towards its characters, and really cared about what happened to them, I’m experiencing none of that in GTA V. Indeed, it’s almost the opposite. I’m all up for playing anti-heroes, or following the questionable choices of characters whose decisions I can understand, even if I don’t agree with. But in many respects, GTA V just seems to be unpleasant for the sake of it.

On a technical level, GTA V is a mind-boggling achievement. It’s a living, breathing environment filled with amazing detail. Its sophistication is incredible and represents a new high water mark for the series. But while the technical side of things has evolved steadily over time, the creativity behind GTA’s structure remains largely mired in the same format that GTA III rolled out with some twelve years ago.

I was hoping that by now, GTA games would feature branching plots and meaningful choices. I understand that this kind of design structure is challenging to make, and in some respects involves potential wastage, because inevitably, the developer has to create aspects of the game, or branches of the storyline that not all players might see or experience. But to me, if you can create San Andreas, then surely you can create a more subtle, nuanced and involving story worthy of that utterly incredible environment.

Need to get away from things? Fortunately San Andreas has a few quiet spots where you can sit back and enjoy the scenery without some chump yelling in your ear.

Now of course I understand that GTA V is not for everyone, and that just like a movie, sometimes you like the story and characters, and other times you don’t. But what disappoints me is that this story – at least for me – takes the edge off what’s truly great about this game: its environment, and what you can do within it. Most missions are fun, and the heists are exceptionally good.

Is there any possible way that those could have been detached from a linear storyline, so that I could get to choose what I wanted to do? Perhaps making the objective simply to raise cash so I can enjoy all the fun and toys GTA V has to offer, but in doing so - pulling off heists, or doing “jobs” for people – have those choices result in meaningful consequences. Perhaps putting me at war with certain people. Perhaps even preventing me from doing certain things in the game until I “fix” the situation. Essentially, I’m simply articulating my desire to be able to more effectively pick and choose what I want to do. Be my own man. Let me create my own story and make my own moral choices. And not be propelled down a railroad where every station and stop is mapped out for me, and the destination is not a place I necessarily want to be.

And perhaps it will. I’m hoping that GTA Online will be the thing I’m looking for. If it contains all the fun stuff you can do in this game, and forgoes the plot – leaving me free to live the life in Los Santos that I’d like to live – I’m going to be very, very much down with that. That way, instead of simply playing through missions one after the other, I really do get to build something and create my own character and story. That sounds a lot more interesting to me than helping people I don’t like get rich.

I want that money for myself!

This article may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and buy the product we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.

Comments 7

Comments on this article are now closed. Thanks for taking part!

  • Avatar for brionfoulke91 #1 brionfoulke91 5 years ago
    Honestly, the strength of GTA has never been the characters or the story. GTA has always had terrible scripts, ludicrious stories, jarring tonal shifts, and extremely crass attempts at humor. The best moments in GTA storylines are the parts that are so absurd you have to laugh at them, like James Woods ordering you to break into Area 51 in San Andreas.

    GTA IV took itself a little more seriously, and although the writing was still bad, it wasn't bad in a way that made it easy to laugh at like earlier titles. With GTA V, it looks like they've taken a more schizophrenic tact, by having three main characters which all seem to have their own tone. The result is not quite as uninteresting as GTA IV's story, but it certainly doesn't work.

    But, in the end it doesn't matter much. Most people who play GTA aren't playing for the story.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Captain-Gonru #2 Captain-Gonru 5 years ago
    An interesting take. I wonder if we would get a create-a-character option in your branching path GTA. I would love it, frankly.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for d0x #3 d0x 5 years ago
    I really don't think you are meant to sympathize with Michael. He's a bad guy, everything he has done was his choice. I think the point of his character is to try and understand why he's done what he's done. My point is further reinforced by the fact that the Dr is in the game. I'm only just meeting Trevor in my game but I already like the other 2. They both have their own motivations but neither is a tragic story where I think I'm supposed to feel bad for them. They both made a choice to lead these lives. Nobody is forcing them.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for d0x #4 d0x 5 years ago
    @brionfoulke91 I disagree big time. GTA games have always had interesting albeit crazy and at times over the top stories. People certainly play the games for them. If they didn't everyone would stop at mission 2 and just drive around being crazy and using cheat codes to unlock things. I know I played San andreas , GTA 4 and now 5 to experience the story. I'll enjoy the hell out of the rest too but I like a story to drive me forward.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Fatbobbybob #5 Fatbobbybob 5 years ago
    Great article Jaz, you obviously put a lot of thought into it. My main take is that an open world game is incredibly hard to fill with cool things to do let alone an engaging and thought provoking storyline. You can see why Saints Row essentially dropped the focus on story. I'd love to see a Telltale Walking Dead like story delivered with the same technical and cinematic flair.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Fatbobbybob #6 Fatbobbybob 5 years ago
    Great article Jaz, you obviously put a lot of thought into it. My main take is that an open world game is incredibly hard to fill with cool things to do let alone an engaging and thought provoking storyline. You can see why Saints Row essentially dropped the focus on story. I'd love to see a Telltale Walking Dead like story delivered with the same technical and cinematic flair.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Ogg #7 Ogg 4 years ago
    It is clear and obvious that the writer of this article is one of two things:

    1) In a rush to write an article about GTA V before actually playing to have a sense of the characters.

    2) Unable to relate emotionally to the truth behind the characters.

    I made an account just to write about this! It's ridiculous that in the game of the century where for the first time in gaming history it is widely considered and recognised that the best part of the game is the development of the characters instead of the usual violence and free-killing. Reading this article I see the voiced thoughts of myself after mission, say, 23 out of the total 69. Yes Michael mistreats his family - no sympathy. Trevor has the one-dimension of uncontrollable, irrational anger and so little emotion there. But you have to give it a while... you see a changed Michael who you are compelled to aid in his struggles to help his family. With Trevor you honestly feel for him when yet another person he loves leaves him in the game. That a video game can arouse emotion in the gamers is a spectacle and down to the characters so I will have to disagree with you saying you do not love the characters as much as the game. Yes I respect your opinion but I don't think it is a fully formulated one. Play some more it is fun and you will see what I mean. I actually doubt that the second option of the above is the case here as I think this belief is pretty widespread. Sorry for being long; woops.
    Sign in to Reply