Halo 5: Guardians Xbox One Review: Three in One

One of the most-anticipated Xbox One titles of the year has finally arrived. Just how good is it?

Review by Jaz Rignall, .

Since Halo 5: Guardians is essentially a game of three parts, I'm going to split this review into sections covering each of its components: Campaign, Arena, and Warzone. First up comes the Campaign…

…and that's where I'm the most ambivalent about the game. That might sound like I'm coming out swinging with a negative statement, but ambivalence is a state of mixed feelings, and that's exactly what playing through the Campaign's 15 missions left me with.

Campaign Mode

Starting from the top, Halo 5 features a dual-storyline structure with an ensemble cast. Firstly, there's the Blue team, which consists of Master Chief Petty Officer John-117 and his trio of teammates, Kelly-087, Linda-058 and Fred-10. They're on a mission to… well, I'm not going to give away any spoilers here, other than to say that they soon abscond from the mission that they're on and go AWOL for some very good reasons. When this happens, another team is sent after them to find out what's going on and bring them back home. And that's where we introduce the other half of the story, Fireteam Osiris, which is headed by newly minted Spartan, Agent Locke, and his three sidekicks Edward Buck, Holly Tanaka and Olympia Vale.

As the Campaign's missions unfold, the storyline switches between the actions of the two teams, and the bifurcated tale slowly, but surely begins to wind in on itself and come together. It's a quite convoluted yarn, and one whose finer details didn't always make a whole lot of sense to me – but then I don't follow the Halo comics, books and digital series from which many of the characters are drawn. Had I read and watched them, I'm sure I'd have a better understanding of who these people are, their history together, and their motivations. The game seems to assume that you already know about these things, but does at least offer some very well voiced expositional banter between the characters that helps fill in some of the details.

Regardless, most of the storyline seems to be a justification for a whole lot of ass kicking, and that's okay in my book. So let's move onto the action, which is definitely a lot more clear-cut than the storyline.

Campaign plays out either as a single-player game with three AI bots, or co-operatively drop-in/drop-out with online friends, and starts with an intense action sequence that sets a frantic pace, with impressive cutscenes transitioning to gameplay in classic style. What immediately becomes apparent as you start to maneuver across the landscape is that these Halo 5 Spartans are more agile and adept than those of yore. They can clamber over obstacles, dodge, and shoulder-charge athletically, resulting in them having a very contemporary feel.

The gunplay also feels excellent. Aiming, shooting and general maneuvering are all silky-smooth, and the end result is a game that plays very well indeed. Whatever you want to do, you always feel fully in control, and with a high degree of finesse – which is just what you need in some of the more intense firefights that the game features.

Speaking of guns, there are a nice variety of them, from deadly plasma pistols through classic needle guns to sniper weapons and shotguns. I did initially find it annoying to continually run out of ammo, especially when you have a decent weapon that can waste all and sundry, but then that is, and has always been a part of Halo's shtick. You end up using whatever weapons you can get your hands on, and in a way that adds to the game's challenge. There was never a time when I completely ran out of arms. Even on the boss fights, there's usually several thoughtfully-placed containers packing a few interesting weapons that can be found nearby. All you need to do is look for them.

The campaign's structure is typically Halo. There are larger set pieces connected by cutscenes and gameplay sequences where you're working your way through landscapes, abandoned ships and other futuristic alien locales. The cutscenes are very impressive indeed – definitely up there as some of the best I've seen. In-game graphics are of a very high quality too. Most of the game is great to look at, with stunning vistas that are well rendered and lit, with a good feeling of depth and space.

Where I have mixed feelings about the game is in its set-piece action. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed playing through the game, but where I found it was weak was in its variety. There are a lot of firefights where you're working your way through waves of alien forces, and as you make progress, quite a few of the latter ones feel like repeats of earlier encounters. There's definitely nothing wrong with the behavior of the enemy – they're smart and can be quite challenging to outshoot. The setting of some of the firefights can also make them a little more interesting too, but ultimately there just seemed to be just a few too many sequences where I was moving forward constantly, picking off the enemy like a shooting gallery.

Fortunately, there are missions where you can jump into vehicles and tanks, and have at it – which is really fun – but those moments are quite rare, and for the most part you're just pouring bullets into the same kinds of enemies. Even some of the boss fights feel a little one-note. Again, quite challenging, but ultimately boiling down to pouring lead and plasma into a bullet sponge that takes just a little too long to kill.

It's not a huge complaint, but I just occasionally wished for a little more variety in terms of gameplay mechanics and things to shoot at. Some missions are definitely really solid – indeed the two that I played at the Halo 5 preview event last month are without doubt the most exciting – but some just lack a creative spark, and left me wishing that they were challenging me with something more interesting than just more enemies to blast into oblivion.

Campaign is most enjoyable as a multiplayer experience, since playing co-operatively with friends is simply more fun than playing solo – especially if you dial up the difficulty level to ensure that you really have to work together to survive. But even so, like when you play solo, the action can still start to feel a little repetitive. It's just less noticeable in multiplayer mode because you're more aware of what other players are doing, and are coordinating together towards a common goal versus just taking on everything yourself.

Ultimately, Halo 5: Guardians' Campaign is robust, looks great, but it's not consistent. There are some moments of greatness – when you're taking down a skyscraper-sized Kraken late in the game, it's fantastic – but that contrasts with some shooting gallery missions that feel a little unimaginative and rote. It's definitely satisfying as an overall experience, but don't expect the game to constantly engage and wow you throughout its entire campaign.


Moving on to what is essentially the spiritual successor to Halo's legacy PvP, Arena is 4 vs 4 competition set in smaller battlegrounds. Players are grouped together using a new competitive skill rating system that ranks participants on seven levels, and that should deliver good quality matchmaking across Arena's various modes, Breakout, Strongholds, Capture the Flag, Slayer, Free-for-All and SWAT. I'll follow up on this in a later article, as during the review period there were only limited amounts of players actively participating, so it was difficult to see just how good the matchmaking is.

What's for sure, however, is that Arena is very well designed and highly entertaining to play. First of all, I found the more adept and athletic Spartans rewarding and enjoyable to control. While they’re not quite up there with the likes of the Call of Duty: Black Ops III operatives in terms of sheer agility and parkour-like smoothness, they nevertheless have a current feel to them that works well in the new Arena environments.

Spartans now have unlimited sprint capability, which helps you get around the map fairly quickly (although your shields don't regenerate while you're running), and they also have thrust move capabilities that enable them to evade incoming fire if you're quick enough. They can slide too, and can also perform a Ground Pound where the character leaps into the air, hovers briefly, and then comes crashing down with a drop-in melee move that can be quite devastating to anyone who happens to be standing in close proximity. The controls are intuitive, and it doesn't take very long to incorporate the new maneuvers into your repertoire. And once you do, the end result is the fastest, most fluid, and dynamic-feeling Halo combat yet.

The arenas seem to have been designed with the new maneuvers in mind, and they work very well to deliver quite tight-knit combat, but with sufficient space to ratchet up the tension. By that I mean that they're big enough so that you can move around without running into an enemy every few seconds – but they're not so large that you can get lost in them for minutes at a time and not see another player.

Of all the modes, I really enjoyed Breakout most of all. This is a best-of-seven rounds game where players only have one life, with no respawns. The objective is to simply take out the other team or capture the centrally-placed flag, and while seven rounds sounds like quite a lot, both teams are essentially thrown together in a firefight that can be over very quickly – especially when one team starts to get the upper hand.

But while I liked Breakout the most, I still really enjoyed the other modes too. They're just very well suited to the Arena environments, and make for some really tense and entertaining PvP. Everything seems to be very well balanced and designed, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Arena become a popular eSport in the not-too-distant future, such is its quality.

Warzone and Warzone Assault

While Arena PvP generally offers quite close-knit combat, Warzone is almost completely the opposite. This 12 vs 12 combination of PvP and PvE is played out over large-scale battlegrounds in which each team fights for control over different objectives.

As the battle rages back and forth, additional PvE forces are dropped into the fray, and they can be taken care of for bonus points. However, many of them aren't trivial, and require a small team of players to be able to take them out. That throws up some interesting tactical quandaries. Should you and your team go and take on one of these points-rich objectives, at the risk of leaving your nodes sparsely defended, or do you let the other team go for it, while you assault their nodes?

Warzone Assault is a variant of Warzone, and this is a little more straightforward - an asymmetrical battle in which one team assaults the other team's nodes with the objective to take out the core in their base. The defending team has a time limit to hold their first node, and if they're successful, the game ends. If the opposing team takes that node, however, the time limit is extended, and the battle moves onto the next node, and then the base. The action here is very frantic, with both teams essentially thrown together in one huge, protracted firefight.

Both Warzone and Warzone Assault deliver really dynamic-feeling PvP modes. Whether you're attacking a base, dealing with a PvE bonus threat, or just running around picking off stragglers from the opposing team, there always seems to be plenty of things to do. While 12 v 12 doesn't sound like a whole lot of players, especially compared to games like Star Wars: Battlefront, the maps are nicely designed to ensure that combat feels intense, and that there's very little downtime in terms of getting back into the thick of the action if you get killed.

I even liked the new REQ system. These are essentially packs of cards that you can buy with REQ points that you earn by playing both PvP game modes, acquire by completing specific objectives – or you can buy them using real money if you so desire. Inside each pack is a random selection of items, such as unlockable weapons and armor, vehicles, and cosmetic items like different assassination moves and stances. Some of these items are one-off use, while others are permanent, such as weapons with specific augments like long-range sights.

There are more than a thousand of these cards, and they come in three kinds of packs that vary in cost. The cheaper option has common, less useful cards while the more expensive pack can have rare, legendary and even mythic items. Any cards that you acquire go into a collection that you can sort and administrate whenever you want.

REQs are used in Warzones by utilizing a REQ station at one of your occupied bases. By logging into a station, you can quickly change your loadout, swap weapons or even spawn vehicles if you have the right cards – and enough energy to use them. Energy is generated throughout the battle, and, depending on the card you're using, it has a specific cost to activate. As you might imagine, the more powerful the card, the more energy you need to cash it in.

It's a system that works well, and I found I tended to have favored loadouts depending on the kind of role I wanted to play in that particular Warzone. For example, using weapons with long-range sights so I could play more of a support/pinning role versus using shorter-range assault weapons for when I wanted to help attack a well-defended node. REQs ultimately add an extra level of depth and interest to Warzones that enable you to potentially change the face of the battle by using vehicles or even loadouts to help you in certain circumstances.


As a package, Halo 5: Guardians is a very solid offering. While the campaign mode has its ups and downs – and to be blunt, doesn't take particularly long to complete – it's nevertheless enjoyable, even if it can get a little relentless and repetitive at times. But its highs definitely outweigh its lows, and if you play it on the more challenging levels – and especially if you play it in co-op mode – it's entertaining enough.

But for me, the PvP side of the game is the real standout. I feel 343 Industries has designed tight, interesting and well-balanced Arenas that deliver some really intense, small-team PvP action, and done a great job in blowing out Warzone into a full-scale combat mode where there's always something to do.

Both PvP modes are consistently entertaining, and offer two different kinds of experiences. Arena is more of a "real" PvP mode where the action is tight, fast, intense and quite gripping, while Warzone is a little more inclusive in terms of giving players a broader range of activities to participate in – there are PvE targets to take down, nodes to assault and defend, and vehicle-based combat too.

All three modes combine to deliver a game that has several facets. The Campaign will keep you busy for a few days – maybe even a week or so if you really enjoy the action and want to play through it a few times on different difficulty settings and with friends. But it's in its PvP modes where Halo 5: Guardians is strongest, and that's where its long-term appeal really lies.

The Nitty Gritty

  • Interface: Well designed to give you all the info you need, while also feeling very nicely integrated into the game.
  • Lasting appeal: While the campaign mode can be completed in a few days, both PvP sides of the game offer a ton of replay value.
  • Sound: Excellent! Great music and effects give the proceedings a very cinematic feel.
  • Visuals: Stunning-looking cutscenes and terrific in-game graphics make this one of the best-looking Xbox One games yet.

The campaign mode hits some great highs over its somewhat short 15-mission span, but also occasionally suffers from a lack of variety, and some boss fights that feel disappointingly one-note. Arena and Warzone offer two distinctly different flavors of PvP action, and both are solid, very well designed, and a lot of fun to play. Ultimately, campaign is a good way to ease you into the game - but it's the PvP modes that deliver the best of what this game has to offer.

4 /5

Halo 5: Guardians Xbox One Review: Three in One Jaz Rignall One of the most-anticipated Xbox One titles of the year has finally arrived. Just how good is it? 2015-10-26T07:01:00-04:00 4 5

This article may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and buy the product we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.

Comments 10

  • Avatar for chaoticBeat #1 chaoticBeat 2 years ago
    I'm happy it's solid. I recently purchased a One for this and to catch up with Halo 4. I started it and it's good, nice graphics, it feels a bit stiff after playing a ton of Destiny. I miss double jumping, sliding and aiming down sights.

    It sounds like 5 adds a lot of agility, which I am thankful for! The ground pound looks like a great, intuitive addition to the gameplay and I'm down with sliding around.

    I miss the old days of completely memorizing the campaign to play again with friends and on legendary. This game came at a good time because I'm trying to cut down on the Destiny addiction and I can play with some buddies that went with xbox. I'm going to apply for graduate school soon so I've gotta taper off my gaming at some point.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for WiIIyTheAntelope #2 WiIIyTheAntelope 2 years ago
    I think I'll be waiting 2 months and then gauge the general reaction. I remember Halo 4 getting 8.5/9 scores across the internet, and let's be honest, that was a 6/10 game at best. And seeing as nearly the entire community had disappeared not 2 months in goes to show I wasn't alone in that sentiment.

    I guess a new Halo game just initially blurs peoples vision, but I bought Halo 4 and MCC at launch. I've learned my lesson.Edited October 2015 by WiIIyTheAntelope
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for yuberus #3 yuberus 2 years ago
    My question is if the multiplayer is done up Halo 4/COD style with loadouts and barely anything on the map, or if its closer to the Halo 1-Reach style where there's plenty of arms scattered around the level. The latter approach is FAR more fun.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Jaz_Rignall #4 Jaz_Rignall 2 years ago
    @yuberus In Warzone, it's all about the REQ system this time around - you can change your loadout by logging into the REQ machine, or by accessing it whenever you die. Players also drop the guns they're using, and you can pick them up.

    In Arena, there are guns lying around that you can pick up and use.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for gamer1234cv #5 gamer1234cv 2 years ago
    Great review.Edited October 2015 by gamer1234cv
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Axelhander #6 Axelhander 2 years ago
    Is there grinding in PvP, like Halo 4? Like the need to fill an experience bar for anything other than aesthetic rewards?

    Also, is the final boss a QTE, like Halo 4?

    Both things seriously turned me off.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Ralek #7 Ralek 2 years ago
    "Is there grinding in PvP, like Halo 4? Like the need to fill an experience bar for anything other than aesthetic rewards?"

    In Arena, no, in Warzone, yes.

    "Also, is the final boss a QTE, like Halo 4?"

    I think aside from Tartarus at the end of Halo 2, Halo boss fights were largely a bust, not to mention that there are not that many to begin with. Also, ending a FPS game with a 'car racing' sequence was just as odd as ending it with a QTE - at least to me.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Uncompetative #8 Uncompetative 2 years ago

    There is grinding.

    With 2000 REQ points for every Warzone match you participate in, but only half that in Arena. These can be used to unlock cosmetic items like coloured visors, a multitude of armors, helmets, weapon skins, emblems, stances, and assassination moves - this last one being like Killzone: Shadow Fall.

    Those who are impatient can buy REQ Packs of random contents. The items they didn't hope would turn up can be recycled into more REQ points. Some items can only be used in Warzone and are set to be single use. This Pay2Win mechanism is partially counterbalanced by the items you have paid to unlock early in your REQ menu being impossible to use in Warzone until you have proven yourself to be worthy by killing the enemy team, securing objectives, or killing the aliens that crop up around the periphery of the map. An exploit where "jungling" these AI rather than fighting the enemy team could reap sufficient Victory Points for a rich team to request Power Weapons and Phaeton gunships early has been address by 343i by lowering the reward for killing these VIP AIs from 200 VP down to 150 and attempting to put those who have unlocked equivalent REQs by grind or Microtransaction against each other so that the rich don't excessively "grief" the poor. It is not perfectly counterbalanced, but it is being sold as a social mode with Arena remaining entirely free of any Pay2Win unfairness.

    The final boss is a QTE similar to Metal Gear Solid 4. The cliffhanger ending is a damp squib only redeemed by a teasing bonus post credits cutscene that foreshadows the main threat of Halo 6 which can only be accessed by playing through the entire campaign on Legendary difficulty.Edited October 2015 by Uncompetative
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Uncompetative #9 Uncompetative 2 years ago

    Well by then it will be finished! With the Forge and Big Team Battle modes delayed until December and the community deciding on what additional playlist to add to the rotation as it currently lacks both Team Doubles and Team Snipers, amongst others.

    I was quite surprised to see Polygon give this a 9 / 10.

    I would give Halo 5 / 10
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for mayara-santos #10 mayara-santos A year ago
    Deleted February 2017 by mayara-santos
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for mayara-santos #11 mayara-santos A year ago
    Nice, Great article, but I think hope those game changers can bring about some much-needed changes, because I feel that the NHL series in terms of simulating the sport currently lags far behind the likes of NBA2K and Fifa, MLB the Show and even Madden - now that Madden has finally improved with Madden 16, do not you think? And also interactivity xbox live games with gold 2017 interactivity I was only familiar with seeing on arcade cabinets, where it seemed like every game shipping was using oversized trackballs or flashing lights or images projected backwards into tinted mirror to create some kind of Pepper's Ghost effect. This mario thing was boring, but I create just knew that Duck Hunt was the dawn of the kind of game industry that I was looking for: One where you had to keep buying unique hardware devices to interact with your . To this day I can't do that on purpose. I did play donkey kong, but I managed to miss it in arcades. I did also play a port of mario on an early home computer owned by a friend of my father's, but I can't remember if that was before or after I got . I also don't remember what kind of computer it was, but I know he also had Pitfall. It was around the time Pokemania was gripping America, and my friend decided to get a different boyGame Boy Game. I took turns with my group, and managed to get to the last world. Never really finished the game, but it was a fun ride no matter how I played . They didn't speak much English, and I was a dumb kid who thought they may as well have been talking in tongues. Anyhow, for two glorious summer vacations, we blipped and blooped our days away.Edited 4 times. Last edited May 2017 by mayara-santos
    Sign in to Reply