Just Cause Dev: AAA Development Is "Not Healthy"

Just Cause Dev: AAA Development Is "Not Healthy"

Avalanche Studios' Christofer Sundberg predicts a rough generation for AAA development.

Remember when you bought a $60 game and you got a (hopefully) finished product? These days, big-budget developers are having trouble making ends meet as they continue to create massive experiences and visual feasts for players. So they've turned to alternate models: premium subscriptions, microtransactions, and early access. They're just searching for any port in a storm, which is also why they're taking less risks in what they make.

AAA development is in a precarious position right now, according to Avalanche Studios founder and creative director Christofer Sundberg.

"It's really not healthy at the moment," Sundberg told Gamespot when asked about AAA development. "Games have evolved, technology has evolved but as businesses we're still stuck where we were 15 years ago. As budgets grow, risks increase. The publishers are nervous because they have to project a game being a massive hit three years into the future and the developers are frustrated because they need to be flexible to every move the publishers make. It's impossible to make everyone happy in the current equation."

Avalanche Studios is in a unique position because it isn't currently owned by a larger parent company. The studio is developing games for larger publishers like Square Enix and Warner Bros Interactive Entertainment, while continuing to dabble in mobile development through its Expansive Worlds offshoot studio. That keeps Avalanche moving in different directions and preparing for market shifts if its titles happen to fail.

Avalanche's next game will be Mad Max, a game which Sundberg says has "fantastic" pre-order sales numbers. Still, profitability is a concern for Avalanche.

"It's a bit early for me to feel comfortable though," Sundberg said. "The investments in a AAA game these days are huge and even if everyone of those two million people bought a copy each, most big games would not break even if they were next-gen exclusives. Very few traditional $60 games make any money, and what used to make sense doesn't any more. Publishers and developers very rarely see a return of investment from a 5-8 hour long game."

That's why we've been seeing more additional multi-player modes in games that would otherwise be single-player. Sundberg's statements also make sense of the crazy sales expectations that major publishers have for solid titles that aren't super blockbusters. High sales expectations lead to risk-averse behavior in publishers, which "kills innovation" according to Sundberg. Despite that, he's not all doom and gloom.

"I hope and think we will see improvements over time," Sundberg said.

Sometimes we include links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. See our terms & conditions.

Mike Williams

Reviews Editor

M.H. Williams is new to the journalism game, but he's been a gamer since the NES first graced American shores. Third-person action-adventure games are his personal poison: Uncharted, Infamous, and Assassin's Creed just to name a few. If you see him around a convention, he's not hard to spot: Black guy, glasses, and a tie.

Related articles

Stardew Valley Just Got Beaches, Fish Tanks, Swimming Ducks, and a Whole Lot More

Nearly five years on, Eric "ConcernedApe" Barone just pushed what he says is Stardew's "biggest update yet."

Alien: Isolation Is Free on Epic and Just As Good as It Was in 2014

Get the motion tracker and don't go in the vents.

Shigeru Miyamoto Expresses Confidence in the Younger Generation of Nintendo

The legendary creator says the spirit will stay alive.

You may also like

Press Start to Continue

A look back on what we tried to accomplish at USgamer, and the work still to be done.

Mat's Farewell | The Truth Has Not Vanished Into Darkness

This isn't the real ending, is it? Can't be.