Madden Lawsuit Moves Forward as EA Sports' Free Speech Defense Fails

Madden Lawsuit Moves Forward as EA Sports' Free Speech Defense Fails

As far as the Supreme Court is concerned, EA knew what it was doing when it used the likenesses of former NFL players.

The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected EA Sports' free speech defense in the lawsuit involving the Madden franchise, according to a report by Reuters. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of former NFL players, who contend that EA is using their likenesses without compensation.

Electronic Arts pays a license fee to the NFL to use the likenesses of current NFL players, but it hasn't paid any fees for the likenesses of former NFL players. EA Sports previously argued that the use of the likenesses was "incidental" and protected by free speech laws. A previous ruling in January 2015 disagreed with this contention, as did the high court in this case.

"EA's use of the former players' likenesses is not incidental, because it is central to EA's main commercial purpose - to create a realistic virtual simulation of football games involving current and former NFL teams," Circuit Judge Raymond Fisher explained in the ruling for the appeal in January 2015.

The lawsuit was filed on the behalf of former NFL players, including Tony Davis from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Vince Ferragamo from the LA Rams, and Billy Joe DuPree from the Dallas Cowboys. EA Sports argued that the use of likenesses was coincidental, as the names weren't used within the game, only the basic visual attributes. The ruling above and this current ruling have shot down that defense.

This is a similar case to the one filed by former college football players in relation to NCAA Football. The result of that case was EA Sports ultimately decided to cease development on its annual NCAA titles. Here, EA Sports probably won't drop Madden NFL, but it's likely that previous players' stats and likenesses will be removed for the game completely. The lawsuit in this case involved the use of likenesses from 2001 to 2009.

The case in question is Electronic Arts v. Davis, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 15-424.

Sometimes we include links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. See our terms & conditions.

Mike Williams

Reviews Editor

M.H. Williams is new to the journalism game, but he's been a gamer since the NES first graced American shores. Third-person action-adventure games are his personal poison: Uncharted, Infamous, and Assassin's Creed just to name a few. If you see him around a convention, he's not hard to spot: Black guy, glasses, and a tie.

Related articles

Cuphead's Delicious Last Course Pushed Back Until It's Ready

The final sip will need to steep a while longer.

Super Mario Maker Support on Wii U is Coming to an End Next Year

That means it'll also be removed from the eShop soon.

Microsoft Is Working to "Identify and Resolve" Performance Issues in Xbox Series X Games

A Microsoft spokesperson says that developers are "just now scratching the surface" of what the new Xbox consoles can do.

Metro Exodus Is Getting a Next-Gen Version Next Year

4A Games is also working on the next Metro and exploring potential for multiplayer.

You may also like

Sony Promises More PS5 Supply for Holidays After Record-Breaking Launch

Despite the widespread e-commerce woes, the PS5 had the biggest console debut ever.

Marvel's Avengers Has Yet to Make Back Its Development Costs

Square Enix is saying it will continue pushing toward making the game profitable, however.

Baldur's Gate 3's Next Update Will Have Its First Story Changes

Be sure to read the fine print about your saves, though.

Red Dead Online Will Launch as a Separate Game Next Month

It'll be pretty cheap at launch, too.