OpenCritic Arises to Disrupt Metacritic's Dominance

OpenCritic Arises to Disrupt Metacritic's Dominance

There's a new review aggregation tool on the block.

In theory, Metacritic is a great idea. A single site where I can find every published review for the media of my choice? Sure, sign me up.

The dark side of Metacritic, though, can be found in the all-powerful Metascore. These two digits comprise the average of every posted review, and, as we've seen in countless arguments throughout the decades, there's no "industry standard" for this type of mathematical evaluation—nor can there ever be. The equivalent of a 100-point score for USgamer (5 out of 5) is much different than, say, a 100-point score on PC Gamer, since their scale goes all the way to 100.

These Metascores would be a slight annoyance if they were only used for the sake of Console Warrior pissing contests, but, for a while now, they've had a much more insidious impact on the lives of developers. They often control the fates of bonuses and future projects, which puts unnecessary pressure on both devs and the people who review their games. And the Metascore can be an especially tricky proposition if you write reviews for a site with an atypical scoring system. When I worked at, which used a letter-grade scale, I remember our evaluations being transformed into numbers much lower than the ones we would use if a 100-point scale was forced upon us. A respectable B amounted to a 75 on Metacritic, which always seemed more than a little off.

When it comes the review aggregating business, there's definitely room for competition, and the new website OpenCritic has arisen as a Metacritic alternative. And unlike its popular counterpart, OpenCritic offers some degree of personalization for readers, allowing them to filter out the websites of their choice (hopefully not ours). The only downside can be found in the fact that OpenCritic also relies on review scores, though it does present them as they were originally published. My review for Her Story, for instance, is represented as a 4.5 out of 5 on OpenCritic, which Metacritic converts to a 90. And even sites that abstain from review scores, like Kotaku and Rock, Paper, Shotgun are included in OpenCritic's review roundup.

Even if OpenCritic somehow disrupts Metacritic's kung-fu grip on the industry, there's always the chance that its equivalent of the Metascore can be just as potentially destructive. Until then, though, it's always nice to have another option—just as long as you don't take it too seriously.

Sometimes we include links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. See our terms & conditions.

Related articles

A Fresh Look at New Super Mario Bros. U on Switch: Does it Measure Up to the Classics?

Where does New Super Mario Bros. U Deluxe rank alongside Super Mario Bros. 3 and Super Mario World?

The State of Destiny 2 After Forsaken: A Game That Can't Shake Its Troubles

Forsaken was a solid start, but it wasn't enough to pull everyone back.

Sorry Pokemon Fans, Your Gold-Plated Cards from Burger King Aren't Worth Squat

Burger King's Pokemon cards from 1999 look kind of nice and they're fun to remember, but they're barely worth the cost of a milkshake.

You may also like

Press Start to Continue

A look back on what we tried to accomplish at USgamer, and the work still to be done.

Mat's Farewell | The Truth Has Not Vanished Into Darkness

This isn't the real ending, is it? Can't be.

Eric's Farewell | Off to Find a New Challenger

It's time for us to move on, but we'll carry USG with us wherever we go.