Counterpoint: People Think Campo Santo is Dangerous for Issuing PewDiePie a DMCA Takedown, They're Not

Counterpoint: People Think Campo Santo is Dangerous for Issuing PewDiePie a DMCA Takedown, They're Not

The precedent Campo Santo supposedly sets isn't so much a precedent as it is their right.

This past weekend, YouTube celebrity Felix "PewDiePie" Kjellberg said the n-word while livestreaming a game of PlayerUnknown's Battleground. Although not confirmed to be a direct response to that particular incident, Firewatch developer Campo Santo issued a DMCA takedown of one of Kjellberg's videos where he played their game in a Let's Play. The move was meant to separate Campo Santo and Kjellberg, but a group of internet users have sprung up against Campo Santo for supposedly setting a dangerous precedent.

The only problem is that it's not precedent when video game companies already reserve the right to take down videos featuring their games.

Felix "PewDiePie" Kjellberg

Social media users in support of Kjellberg, or even just against Campo Santo's DMCA action, are arguing for a variety of things like a boycott of Campo Santo—or even weirder—for Kjellberg to sue Campo Santo and win the rights to Firewatch. Some have even cited a post on Campo Santo's website that encourages livestreaming as "false advertising" and grounds for litigation.

Like many of the people sounding off on Twitter, I'm not a lawyer. But I'm also not here to mince any words. Campo Santo wanted to separate the company and its game from Kjellberg—who has a history of racist and anti-semitic outbursts—and as lawyers have already commented, it is in Campo Santo's right to issue the DMCA as Firewatch is its own license.

"Ideas are not protected under copyright but the expression of an idea is," lawyer Michael Lee of Morrison & Lee LLP told Glixel in an interview. "Therefore, many parts of a video game are protected under copyright including the look of the game, the dialogue, and the music. The DMCA permits copyright owners to issue takedown requests of people infringing the copyright to a game. Technically, video game companies can issue takedown requests for any gameplay that is posted online and companies like Nintendo have done this in the past."

Lee cites bad feedback as a reason why companies don't usually wield DMCA takedowns, but if Kjellberg's being is something Campo Santo wants nothing to be a part of, that's just how the system works.

Firewatch

Naturally, as my coworker Mike and others have pointed out, DMCA takedowns have been used previously to the detriment of various online communities. Nintendo, Atlus' Persona 5 streaming, and others come to mind. So it's weird that there are those saying Campo Santos' use of DMCA is setting a precedent when the precedents were already set.

The obvious "precedent" here then is that in this particular case, Campo Santo used the punitive action to separate themselves from an offensive, and one could argue, harmful individual. And if that's a move other game developers want to do to keep their games away from being associated with racists or other dangerous individuals—well, I won't say all power to them because that power is already theirs.

If you're someone who's afraid that a video game company can now come after you for saying racist remarks while playing a video game, then maybe you have to reconsider your priorities since they can already come after your video game video for literally any other reason. And if you're wondering why corporations and private interests have so much power over your creative output, as many fair use advocates argue in regards to video game videos, then maybe you should reconsider how you feel about a free market system than you do about an indie game studio that doesn't want to associate themselves with an offensive YouTube personality.

Sometimes we include links to online retail stores. If you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. See our terms & conditions.

Matt Kim

News Editor

Matt Kim is a former freelance writer who's covered video games and digital media. He likes video games as spectacle and is easily distracted by bright lights or clever bits of dialogue. He also once wrote about personal finance, but that's neither here nor there.

Related articles

We Received Another Reminder This Week That Delays Don't Help Crunch⁠—They Add to It

THIS WEEK IN THE BUSINESS | While a new console generation means change is in the air, some trends, like rampant crunch, remain unfortunate industry staples.

Masahiro Sakurai Made Fools of Us All With One Subtle Gesture Before the Byleth Reveal

Sakurai has a twisted sense of humor, and he's not afraid to use it.

WoW's Visions of N'Zoth May Not Be Enough To Keep Players Satisfied Until Shadowlands

The theme is strong with this patch, but the content might not keep players engaged.

Calling Persona 5 Scramble a Spin-Off Doesn't Quite Do It Justice

Persona's take on the musou sub-genre is more of a sequel than fan-service.

You may also like

Is Sony Making the Right Call by Skipping E3 2020?

COMMUNITY QUESTION | What do you think about PlayStation 5 skipping E3 2020? We want to hear your opinion.

Where is Our Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot Review?

We're still training ourselves to prepare for the digital Tenkaichi Budokai.

Dragon Ball FighterZ Still Needs More Goku, Apparently

Smash has too many Fire Emblem characters you say? Well…

Apex Legends Player "Hijacks" Portland Airport TV to Squeeze in a Vital Match

We see this player's dedication, and we want to talk.