Where Yoshi's New Island Misses the Mark

Yoshi's latest adventure scored highly with us, but it still disappointed on one level. Where do reviewers draw the line between fair criticism and personal expectations?

Article by Jeremy Parish, .

"No, Yoshi's New Island may not be the game we fans of the original want, but it's definitely the game its creators set out to make. And a lot of fun, too. It's hard to be cynical about that."

So concluded the review Mike and I published yesterday about Yoshi's New Island. At 4 stars out of five, we definitely came in at the high end of the review scale for the game, though we certainly weren't outliers by any means. Yoshi's New Island clicked for some people and infuriated others – it may well be the most divisive game Nintendo has published in ages.

I've seen complaints that our review summary was meant as a preemptive "take that" to the negative reviews, but nothing could be further from the truth. Rather, I meant to capture my own ambivalence over the game. I get what Arzest and Nintendo were going for with Yoshi's New Island, and I think they more or less nailed it. On the other hand, in so slavishly imitating the original Yoshi's Island, they absolutely missed the mark on what I wanted the game to be. Still, during my time as a game reviewer, I've come to understand that reviewing games against some personal, subjective vision isn't particularly fair to the game or to readers, so I try not to do it. That doesn't mean I can't be disappointed on a personal level even when I recognize the inherent quality of a game, though.

Of all Yoshi's myriad challenges, has any been so sisyphean as starring in a game as wildly creative as the original Yoshi's Island?

In Yoshi's New Island, we have case in point. Here is a game that takes content from a classic 16-bit action title, remixes it into entirely new level layouts, and paints it with a new coating of pastel fluffiness. Aside from some minor quibbles about fine details of control (mainly relevant when trying to fling an egg at the lowest angle of depression immediately upon bringing up the targeting reticule; a split-second's worth of input lag makes doing that unreasonably difficult), it plays exactly like Yoshi's Island. And that's a good thing: Yoshi's Island remains possibly my favorite Mario game ever. It offered wonderfully unique mechanics, giving Yoshi control and focusing on his (well, their) ability to produce and throw eggs. It creatively combined platformer and shooter, up to and incorporating an automatically recharging health system that would become the standard for first-person shooters a decade later. And of course it had its distinctive art style, a reactionary hand-drawn design meant to set the game apart from the cold prerendered look of Donkey Kong Country and its imitators.

The problem with Yoshi's New Island is... well, all those adjectives in the previous paragraph. "Unique." "Creative." "Distinctive." The original Yoshi's Island wasn't simply a great platformer, it was a game that set the genre on its side. It was a radically different approach to the format by the team that created the format with years of iterations on Donkey Kong and Super Mario Bros. Yoshi's Island lived to surprise players, beginning with the way it took the special add-on Super FX2 chip, a device intended to enhance 3D graphics, and used it to execute all kinds of fancy 2D graphical embellishments. It looked at the industry's move toward 3D visuals and prerendered assets and thumbed its nose at them. It observed more than a decade of steadfast Super Mario adventures and did everything differently. Yoshi's Island was deliberately contradictory. It was punk. It existed entirely to disrupt through innovation.

In 1995, Yoshi's Island's crayon-box art style was a glorious middle finger to the slavish mindset that games had to dabble in the third dimension in order to be relevant.

Yoshi's New Island, on the other hand, couldn't innovate its way out of a wet paper bag full of Flappy Bird clones. The anarchic glee of the original has been replaced with a gentle conservatism. It's a very well-made repackaging, but for those of us who hoped for something new in a sequel to a 20-year-old game that was all about bringing the new and the unexpected, the familiarity on display feels pretty disappointing. I can definitely understand where all the negative reviews for Yoshi's New Island come from, because there's a resentful little voice in my heart that demanded the same.

I complained in our Yoshi's New Island review that despite repackaging pretty much every element of the Super NES game, it completely skipped the infamous "Touch Fuzzy, Get Dizzy" stage... which bumping into one of the floating puffballs drifting through the level causes Yoshi to succumb to a sort of hallucinogenic warping effect. But honestly, that's OK. The entire point of that stage was to goof around with the Super FX2 chip's capabilities, which is why that particular level was so compromised in the Game Boy Advance port (as it lacked the FX2 chip). In fact, much of what stood out about Yoshi's Island grabbed our attention because it took advantage of graphical capabilities no 2D platformer had enjoyed access to before. Nearly 20 years later, those once-revolutionary ideas are no big deal.

Yoshi's Island stood out because of the way its creators took such delight in pushing the limits of technology within the familiar framework of a 2D platformer. Shigeru Miyamoto's team used new graphical capabilities to fuel their creativity, designing challenges and situations that no other platformer had ever explored before. They broke new ground, and the manic invention on display in the game gave the impression that they had as much fun creating Yoshi's Island as we had playing it.

16-bit technology pushed to its limit to... recreate the sensation of drunkenness. Truly, Japanese office culture at work.

By comparison, you'll find none of that spirit in Yoshi's New Island. Here's the 3DS, a handheld platform utterly humbles the meager capabilities of the Super FX2 chip; it's a console that can almost literally be made to do anything with a 2D platformer. Infinite possibilities await an innovative mind... and all Arzest can think to do is color in the lines. Where's the imagination? Where's the delight in surprising players? Where are the radical new ideas and unexpected new twists on 2D platforming?

Yoshi's Island gave us a vitally important message back in 1995: Technology didn't have to obviate classic game formats. It could just as easily liberate them, suffuse them with new life. While publications like Next Generation were sniffing with disdain at anything limited to two dimensions, Nintendo was providing an example of how to use the potential of new hardware to sidestep the ugly, boxy polygons that defined 3D games of the era and instead put it to use generating beautiful, cutting-edge sprites. Yoshi's Island represented a renaissance for a format the rest of the world was ready to bury. But few have bothered to take up its baton and push 2D gaming to new heights, and Yoshi's New Island – which so carefully mimics a classic while utterly missing the point – really drives that fact home.

On the other hand, Yoshi's Island DS had some new elements and kind of sucked. Is it better to play things safe and succeed than attempt innovation and fall flat?

I refuse to believe 2D innovation is dead. Every once in a while, a game comes along to remind us of the format's potential, which the industry has largely chosen to ignore in favor of pursuing 3D graphics. Even the indie community mostly dabbles in recreations of beloved 8-bit adventures – not that I can blame them. If I didn't have to worry about providing shelter and health insurance for my family, I'd be off making my own dream game, which is basically Konami's The Goonies II with jetpacks. Thankfully, every once in a while, we get a Castlevania: Symphony of the Night or Mark of the Ninja to give us hope for a better future in 2D gaming. Yet Yoshi's New Island, like the New Super Mario Bros. games it shares part of its name with, suggests Nintendo no longer wants to take the lead in that regard; they're happy to take the concepts and mechanics they've honed over the years and simply iterate on them. Heck, given all that the Mario teams have done to define the platformer over the years, maybe they've earned the right to be a bit complacent. Does the inventor of the wheel have to be the one who constantly reinvents it, too?

The saving grace of Yoshi's New Island is that Arzest didn't just reproduce the original game's visual style and mechanics; they also recaptured its underlying design ethos. The excellent level design discipline – which features a bounty of secrets in sneaky yet logical and consistent places – demands players pay attention and play thoroughly. Meanwhile, there are just enough little tricks and one-way traps to let you screw yourself over in small but trivial ways; the game keeps you on your toes without feeling unfair. It's an extremely well-designed platformer, and that always merits praise. But it's possible to enjoy a game and be deeply disappointed by it at the same time, and that describes my experience with Yoshi's New Island. As much as I enjoyed playing it, I also find myself longing for a new game that's willing to pick up where the original left off and take the stagnant 2D platformer to the next level.

This article may contain links to online retail stores. If you click on one and buy the product we may receive a small commission. For more information, go here.

Related Tags

Comments 14

  • Avatar for LBD_Nytetrayn #1 LBD_Nytetrayn 4 years ago
    Reminds me of playing New Super Mario Bros. 2. A 2D Mario game on the Nintendo 3DS: I honestly expected some of the little tricks of Yoshi's Island, like stuff coming out of the background at you, to be on full display. Despite liking some other parts of the game, I was a bit disappointed in that.

    For Yoshi's New Island, though... wow. I'm still playing through, but at the outset at least, I'm amazed at how even the story/opening largely reiterates on the original Yoshi's Island. Not sure what's worse, that or NSMB2's absolute lack of trying to have anything at all.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Damman #2 Damman 4 years ago
    Enjoyed the read. I really like USgamer's tendency to explore the games they cover beyond a single review. It's refreshing to not always just push past each title in favor of what's next on the release schedule. I think I'll consider giving this game a shot. It has been some time since there has been one like it.

    Also, Yoshi's Island DS may not be a good game, but man do those screenshots look crisp and colorful.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for jeremy.parish #3 jeremy.parish 4 years ago
    @Damman Thank you! Discussing new releases beyond the review has always been one of the site's goals since day one, and it's heartwarming to see it's both noticed and appreciated.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for docexe #4 docexe 4 years ago
    This is an issue that has been at the core of the industry for many years already. Games like this one and the New Super Mario Bros. series (hell, and the iterative annualized franchises like COD or Assasin's Creed for that matter) are actually well crafted and ultimately enjoyable to play. Lambasting them as “bad games” for their lack of creativity and innovation isn’t entirely fair.

    And yet, that lack of creativity and innovation and the climate of stagnation that has resulted from it is inevitably maddening. People eventually get bored of playing the “same old, same old”, no matter how good the same old might be.

    The ideal would be for a sequel to retain and improve over the core of what made its predecessors good, while at the same time innovating and offering new and unique things. Yet achieving that balance can be very difficult. Not to mention the even bigger challenge of making a sequel that is dramatically different from its predecessor without alienating the fans of the original or losing the essence of what made the original great.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Pacario #5 Pacario 4 years ago
    "While publications like Next Generation were sniffing with disdain at anything limited to two dimensions..."

    To be fair to that groundbreaking magazine, it did give the original Yoshi's Island a perfect (five star) score.

    But anyway, Yoshi's New Island suffers from the old "Mega Man Syndrome" of basically offering a good but unambitious game designed for a certain audience. Nintendo fanboys will defend the game as being "classic" and "traditional." Haters will consider it generic and derivative. More objective folks will see the truth in both viewpoints and draw a more moderate conclusion.

    The latter, of course, is what every professional critic should strive to do.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for jeremy.parish #6 jeremy.parish 4 years ago
    @Pacario Yes, I know. I enjoyed NG a great deal, but -- YI excepted -- they were brutal to 2D games and quick to gush over cutting-edge titles that even at the time would obviously age terribly. But we all have our weaknesses, I suppose.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Stealth20k #7 Stealth20k 4 years ago
    I liked all the games. I go in without the retro glasses
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Pacario #8 Pacario 4 years ago
    @jeremy.parish I will always love that magazine--still have all the issues stored at my parents' place (save for the very first five which I sadly never acquired).

    In fact, looking back on those days, I'd say the magazine shaped my entire perception of what gaming was and could be--an art form of unlimited possibilities. And almost as importantly, it taught me what professional criticism is really all about--determining and exploring a games's virtues and faults through earnest, contemplative analysis.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Sturat #9 Sturat 4 years ago
    I liked that Next Generation aspired to be more mature than other gaming mags, but they sure did undervalue 2D games, like in their 2-star review of King of Fighters 98 for Dreamcast. ("It's like riding a mo-ped: fun for a while but you wouldn't want anyone else to see you.")
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Pacario #10 Pacario 4 years ago
    @Sturat Ha ha. I don't remember that review, but you have to understand that, at the time, 3-D was still new and exciting, while the few 2-D games coming out were largely uninspired, if polished, reiterations of past titles. And then there were even worse games like Punky Skunk.

    It wouldn't be until the GBA era when 2-D would slowly start making a comeback and prove it still held a lot of untapped potential.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Zomby-Woof #11 Zomby-Woof 4 years ago
    As absurd as it sounds, before reading any reviews I sincerely felt that Yoshi's New Island heralded its own shortcomings with the word "New." After four such Mario games, "New" tells me that there will in fact be very little of what I'd like to think that part of the title suggests. Instead, "New" means it's the newest product fresh off of Nintendo's well-oiled assembly line style of game design: expertly crafted, but with ideas that are hardwired and unchanged in the proven but decades-old machines making them.

    Super Mario 3D World and A Link Between Worlds had me believe that Nintendo was finally, actively cognizant of its own stagnancy within its legacy franchises, but they also seem to know precisely which games need "New" in the title.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for nadiaoxford #12 nadiaoxford 4 years ago
    @jeremy.parish There was also the fact NG haaated the Mega Man Legends series. "lol does anyone even care about Mega Man anymore? C-."
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for Pacario #13 Pacario 4 years ago
    @nadiaoxford Hmm, I don't have a copy of the review in front of me, but the original game got three stars, which signified a "good" game by the mag's standards. The reviewer, to again be fair, did like it, but seemed to think it was something of an acquired taste that took some time to really appreciate.

    Being a huge fan of the series, I would have liked to see it earn at least one more star. But I think its somewhat clumsy controls ruined it for some critics.
    Sign in to Reply
  • Avatar for noahpowell82 #14 noahpowell82 4 years ago
    Do you seriously have an idea for a game?
    Sign in to Reply